School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005, Australia.
South Australian Research and Development Institute, Adelaide, 5001, Australia.
BMC Evol Biol. 2018 May 29;18(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12862-018-1183-4.
Understanding genomic and phenotypic diversity among cryptic pest taxa has important implications for the management of pests and diseases. The diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella L., has been intensively studied due to its ability to evolve insecticide resistance and status as the world's most destructive pest of brassicaceous crops. The surprise discovery of a cryptic species endemic to Australia, Plutella australiana Landry & Hebert, raised questions regarding the distribution, ecological traits and pest status of the two species, the capacity for gene flow and whether specific management was required. Here, we collected Plutella from wild and cultivated brassicaceous plants from 75 locations throughout Australia and screened 1447 individuals to identify mtDNA lineages and Wolbachia infections. We genotyped genome-wide SNP markers using RADseq in coexisting populations of each species. In addition, we assessed reproductive compatibility in crossing experiments and insecticide susceptibility phenotypes using bioassays.
The two Plutella species coexisted on wild brassicas and canola crops, but only 10% of Plutella individuals were P. australiana. This species was not found on commercial Brassica vegetable crops, which are routinely sprayed with insecticides. Bioassays found that P. australiana was 19-306 fold more susceptible to four commonly-used insecticides than P. xylostella. Laboratory crosses revealed that reproductive isolation was incomplete but directionally asymmetric between the species. However, genome-wide nuclear SNPs revealed striking differences in genetic diversity and strong population structure between coexisting wild populations of each species. Nuclear diversity was 1.5-fold higher in P. australiana, yet both species showed limited variation in mtDNA. Infection with a single Wolbachia subgroup B strain was fixed in P. australiana, suggesting that a selective sweep contributed to low mtDNA diversity, while a subgroup A strain infected just 1.5% of P. xylostella.
Despite sympatric distributions and the capacity to hybridize, strong genomic and phenotypic divergence exists between these Plutella species that is consistent with contrasting colonization histories and reproductive isolation after secondary contact. Although P. australiana is a potential pest of brassicaceous crops, it is of secondary importance to P. xylostella.
了解隐存害虫类群的基因组和表型多样性对病虫害的管理具有重要意义。小菜蛾,Plutella xylostella L.,由于其能够进化出抗药性并且是世界上最具破坏性的十字花科作物害虫而受到了深入研究。隐存物种澳大利亚小菜蛾 Plutella australiana Landry & Hebert 的意外发现引发了人们对这两个物种的分布、生态特征和害虫地位、基因流的能力以及是否需要特定管理的质疑。在这里,我们从澳大利亚 75 个地点的野生和栽培的十字花科植物中收集了小菜蛾,并对 1447 个个体进行了 mtDNA 谱系和 Wolbachia 感染筛查。我们使用 RADseq 在每个物种的共存种群中对全基因组 SNP 标记进行了基因分型。此外,我们还通过交配实验评估了生殖相容性,并使用生物测定法评估了杀虫剂敏感性表型。
这两个小菜蛾物种在野生十字花科植物和油菜作物上共存,但只有 10%的小菜蛾个体是澳大利亚小菜蛾。该物种未在商业性的十字花科蔬菜作物上发现,这些作物经常喷洒杀虫剂。生物测定发现,澳大利亚小菜蛾对四种常用杀虫剂的敏感性比小菜蛾高 19-306 倍。实验室交配发现,种间生殖隔离不完全,但方向不对称。然而,全基因组核 SNP 揭示了共存野生种群之间在遗传多样性和强烈的种群结构方面存在显著差异。澳大利亚小菜蛾的核多样性高 1.5 倍,但两种物种的 mtDNA 多样性都有限。一种单一的 Wolbachia 亚群 B 菌株在澳大利亚小菜蛾中固定感染,这表明选择压力导致 mtDNA 多样性降低,而亚群 A 菌株仅感染了 1.5%的小菜蛾。
尽管存在同域分布和杂交能力,但这些小菜蛾物种之间存在强烈的基因组和表型分化,这与它们的对比的殖民历史和二次接触后的生殖隔离相一致。虽然澳大利亚小菜蛾是十字花科作物的潜在害虫,但它对小菜蛾的重要性较低。