Javanainen Tuija, Tolppanen Heli, Lassus Johan, Nieminen Markku S, Sionis Alessandro, Spinar Jindrich, Silva-Cardoso José, Greve Lindholm Matias, Banaszewski Marek, Harjola Veli-Pekka, Jurkko Raija
Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Acute and Intensive Cardiovascular Care Unit, Department of Cardiology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Biomedical Research Institute IIB-Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, CIBER-CV, Barcelona, Spain.
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2018 Sep;23(5):e12561. doi: 10.1111/anec.12561. Epub 2018 May 30.
The most common aetiology of cardiogenic shock (CS) is acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but even up to 20%-50% of CS is caused by other disorders. ST-segment deviations in the electrocardiogram (ECG) have been investigated in patients with ACS-related CS, but not in those with other CS aetiologies. We set out to explore the prevalence of different ST-segment patterns and their associations with the CS aetiology, clinical findings and 90-day mortality.
We analysed the baseline ECG of 196 patients who were included in a multinational prospective study of CS. The patients were divided into 3 groups: (a) ST-segment elevation (STE). (b) ST-segment depression (STDEP). (c) No ST-segment deviation or ST-segment impossible to analyse (NSTD). A subgroup analysis of the ACS patients was conducted.
ST-segment deviations were present in 80% of the patients: 52% had STE and 29% had STDEP. STE was associated with the ACS aetiology, but one-fourth of the STDEP patients had aetiology other than ACS. The overall 90-day mortality was 41%: in STE 47%, STDEP 36% and NSTD 33%. In the multivariate mortality analysis, only STE predicted mortality (HR 1.74, CI 1.07-2.84). In the ACS subgroup, the patients were equally effectively revascularized, and no differences in the survival were noted between the study groups.
ST-segment elevation is associated with the ACS aetiology and high mortality in the unselected CS population. If STE is not present, other aetiologies must be considered. When effectively revascularized, the prognosis is similar regardless of the ST-segment pattern in ACS-related CS.
心源性休克(CS)最常见的病因是急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS),但即使高达20%-50%的CS是由其他疾病引起的。心电图(ECG)中的ST段偏差已在ACS相关CS患者中进行了研究,但在其他CS病因患者中尚未进行研究。我们着手探讨不同ST段模式的患病率及其与CS病因、临床发现和90天死亡率的关联。
我们分析了196例纳入CS多国前瞻性研究的患者的基线心电图。患者分为3组:(a)ST段抬高(STE)。(b)ST段压低(STDEP)。(c)无ST段偏差或无法分析的ST段(NSTD)。对ACS患者进行了亚组分析。
80%的患者存在ST段偏差:52%有STE,29%有STDEP。STE与ACS病因相关,但四分之一的STDEP患者病因不是ACS。总体90天死亡率为41%:STE组为47%,STDEP组为36%,NSTD组为33%。在多因素死亡率分析中,只有STE可预测死亡率(HR 1.74,CI 1.07-2.84)。在ACS亚组中,患者的血管再通效果相同,各研究组之间的生存率无差异。
在未选择的CS人群中,ST段抬高与ACS病因和高死亡率相关。如果不存在STE,则必须考虑其他病因。在ACS相关CS中,当有效进行血管再通时,无论ST段模式如何,预后相似。