Ghazal Tariq S, Cowen Howard J, Caplan Daniel J
Adjunct Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Preventive and Community Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Clinical Professor, Department of Preventive and Community Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Spec Care Dentist. 2018 Jul;38(4):208-215. doi: 10.1111/scd.12294. Epub 2018 May 30.
To assess factors influencing anterior dental restoration longevity among the institutionalized elderly.
Among a sample of Eastern Iowa nursing facility dental patients, one anterior restoration placed from 1985 to 2014 was selected at random from each subject. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated, with restoration failures defined as subsequent restorative codes involving the same surface; endodontic procedures; or extractions. Bivariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling were performed.
In multivariable analyses, the 1985 to 1999 cohort (n = 496) had longer restoration survival in in females < 75 years old versus males < 75 years old (P = 0.016), males ≥75 years old (P = 0.026) and females ≥75 years old (P = 0.030); one- versus three-surface restorations (P < 0.001); and restorations placed by faculty/residents versus pre-doctoral students (P = 0.009). The 2000 to 2014 cohort (n = 521) had longer restoration survival in females < 75 years old versus males ≥75 years old (P = 0.012) and females ≥75 years old (P = 0.019); residents who paid out-of-pocket versus those on Medicaid (P = 0.019); and composite resin versus glass ionomer cement restorations (P < 0.001).
Knowing how long restorations last, and what factors affect their longevity, could improve treatment planning, informed consent, and communication with residents and caregivers, and also help inform practice guidelines for restorative care among the institutionalized elderly.
评估影响机构养老老年人前牙修复体使用寿命的因素。
在爱荷华州东部护理机构的牙科患者样本中,从每个受试者中随机选择一颗于1985年至2014年间进行的前牙修复体。生成Kaplan-Meier生存曲线,修复体失败定义为后续涉及同一表面的修复代码;牙髓治疗程序;或拔牙。进行双变量和多变量Cox比例风险建模。
在多变量分析中,1985年至1999年队列(n = 496)中,75岁以下女性的修复体使用寿命长于75岁以下男性(P = 0.016)、75岁及以上男性(P = 0.026)和75岁及以上女性(P = 0.030);单表面与三表面修复体(P < 0.001);以及由教员/住院医师与博士前学生放置的修复体(P = 0.009)。2000年至2014年队列(n = 521)中,75岁以下女性的修复体使用寿命长于75岁及以上男性(P = 0.012)和75岁及以上女性(P = 0.019);自费的住院医师与医疗补助患者(P = 0.019);以及复合树脂与玻璃离子水门汀修复体(P < 0.001)。
了解修复体的使用寿命以及影响其寿命的因素,可改善治疗计划、知情同意以及与居民和护理人员的沟通,还有助于为机构养老老年人的修复护理实践指南提供依据。