• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与多次皮下胰岛素注射相比,无论患者的基础 C 肽水平如何,胰岛素泵治疗均可改善 2 型糖尿病患者的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、总日胰岛素剂量和治疗满意度。

IMPROVED HBA1C, TOTAL DAILY INSULIN DOSE, AND TREATMENT SATISFACTION WITH INSULIN PUMP THERAPY COMPARED TO MULTIPLE DAILY INSULIN INJECTIONS IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES IRRESPECTIVE OF BASELINE C-PEPTIDE LEVELS.

出版信息

Endocr Pract. 2018 May;24(5):446-452. doi: 10.4158/EP-2017-0234.

DOI:10.4158/EP-2017-0234
PMID:29847166
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Fasting C-peptide levels are used to differentiate type 1 from type 2 diabetes (T2D), thereby determining eligibility for coverage of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) for patients with T2D.

METHODS

A total of 168 patients (74 female/94 male, aged 55.5 ± 9.7 years) were randomized to CSII, and 163 patients (77 female/86 male, aged 56.4 ± 9.5 years) were randomized to multiple daily injections (MDI) of insulin and grouped by baseline C-peptide level: group A (≤183 pmol/L [≤0.55 ng/mL]); group B (>183 pmol/L [>0.55 ng/mL]). At 6 months, the MDI group crossed over to CSII. Within- and between-group comparisons were recorded at 6 and 12 months in the entire group and separately for those patients aged ≥65 years.

RESULTS

CSII reduced hemoglobin A1c (A1c) equally in groups A ( P = .0006, P = .0022) and B ( P<.0001, P<.0001) at 6 and 12 months, respectively. There was an increase in weight in group A versus group B at 6 months but not 12 months ( P<.03). CSII therapy reduced total daily dose (TDD) of insulin and improved treatment satisfaction similarly in groups A and B. The results for patients aged ≥65 years displayed a similar trend as the entire group.

CONCLUSION

A1c, TDD of insulin, and treatment satisfaction improved for T2D patients using CSII versus MDI therapy, irrespective of baseline C-peptide level. A subgroup of patients aged ≥65 years displayed a similar trend. These results support abandoning C-peptide as a criterion for reimbursing CSII therapy in patients with diabetes.

ABBREVIATIONS

A1c = hemoglobin A1c; CMS = Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; CSII = continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion; DTSQ = Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire; MDI = multiple daily injections; RCT = randomized controlled trials; T1D = type 1 diabetes; T2D = type 2 diabetes; TDD = total daily dose.

摘要

目的

空腹 C 肽水平用于区分 1 型糖尿病(T1D)和 2 型糖尿病(T2D),从而确定 T2D 患者接受连续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)治疗的资格。

方法

共 168 例患者(74 例女性/94 例男性,年龄 55.5±9.7 岁)被随机分配至 CSII 组,163 例患者(77 例女性/86 例男性,年龄 56.4±9.5 岁)被随机分配至胰岛素多次皮下注射(MDI)组,并按基线 C 肽水平分组:A 组(≤183 pmol/L [≤0.55ng/mL]);B 组(>183 pmol/L [>0.55ng/mL])。6 个月时,MDI 组交叉至 CSII 组。在整个组和年龄≥65 岁的患者中,分别在 6 个月和 12 个月时记录组内和组间比较。

结果

CSII 在 6 个月和 12 个月时分别使 A 组(P=0.0006,P=0.0022)和 B 组(P<0.0001,P<0.0001)的糖化血红蛋白(A1c)均降低。A 组在 6 个月时体重增加,但 12 个月时未增加(P<0.03)。CSII 治疗降低了 A 组和 B 组的胰岛素总日剂量(TDD),并改善了治疗满意度。年龄≥65 岁患者的结果与整个组相似。

结论

与 MDI 治疗相比,CSII 治疗可改善 T2D 患者的 A1c、胰岛素 TDD 和治疗满意度,与基线 C 肽水平无关。年龄≥65 岁的亚组患者显示出相似的趋势。这些结果支持不再将 C 肽作为糖尿病患者报销 CSII 治疗的标准。

相似文献

1
IMPROVED HBA1C, TOTAL DAILY INSULIN DOSE, AND TREATMENT SATISFACTION WITH INSULIN PUMP THERAPY COMPARED TO MULTIPLE DAILY INSULIN INJECTIONS IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES IRRESPECTIVE OF BASELINE C-PEPTIDE LEVELS.与多次皮下胰岛素注射相比,无论患者的基础 C 肽水平如何,胰岛素泵治疗均可改善 2 型糖尿病患者的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、总日胰岛素剂量和治疗满意度。
Endocr Pract. 2018 May;24(5):446-452. doi: 10.4158/EP-2017-0234.
2
Insulin requirement profiles and related factors of insulin pump therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.2 型糖尿病患者胰岛素泵治疗的胰岛素需求特征及相关因素。
Sci China Life Sci. 2019 Nov;62(11):1506-1513. doi: 10.1007/s11427-018-9530-3. Epub 2019 May 22.
3
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion vs modern multiple injection regimens in type 1 diabetes: an updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.1 型糖尿病患者采用持续皮下胰岛素输注与现代多次胰岛素注射方案的比较:随机临床试验的更新荟萃分析。
Acta Diabetol. 2019 Sep;56(9):973-980. doi: 10.1007/s00592-019-01326-5. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
4
A clinical trial of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections in older adults with type 2 diabetes.老年2型糖尿病患者持续皮下胰岛素输注与每日多次注射的临床试验。
Diabetes Care. 2005 Jul;28(7):1568-73. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.7.1568.
5
Complex Assessment of Metabolic Effectiveness of Insulin Pump Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Beyond HbA1c Reduction.超越 HbA1c 降低:评估胰岛素泵治疗对 2 型糖尿病患者代谢功效的综合影响。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Feb;20(2):153-159. doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0283. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
6
Retrospective analysis and patient satisfaction assessment of insulin pump therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病患者胰岛素泵治疗的回顾性分析及患者满意度评估
South Med J. 2011 Jan;104(1):24-8. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3181fa7230.
7
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections in children and young people at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes: the SCIPI RCT.1 型糖尿病诊断时采用连续皮下胰岛素输注与多次皮下注射胰岛素治疗儿童和青少年:SCIPI RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Aug;22(42):1-112. doi: 10.3310/hta22420.
8
Glycemic Outcomes in Adults With T1D Are Impacted More by Continuous Glucose Monitoring Than by Insulin Delivery Method: 3 Years of Follow-Up From the COMISAIR Study.在 COMISAIR 研究中,3 年的随访结果显示,成人 1 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制结果受连续血糖监测的影响大于胰岛素输送方法:
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(1):37-43. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0888. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
9
Glycemic Control During Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Versus Multiple Daily Insulin Injections in Type 2 Diabetes: Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis and Meta-regression of Randomized Controlled Trials.血糖控制在 2 型糖尿病中的连续皮下胰岛素输注与多次皮下胰岛素注射:随机对照试验的个体患者数据荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
Diabetes Care. 2017 May;40(5):715-722. doi: 10.2337/dc16-2201.
10
OpT2mise: a randomized controlled trial to compare insulin pump therapy with multiple daily injections in the treatment of type 2 diabetes-research design and methods.优化:一项比较胰岛素泵治疗与多次皮下注射治疗2型糖尿病的随机对照试验——研究设计与方法
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014 Jul;16(7):414-20. doi: 10.1089/dia.2013.0363. Epub 2014 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.7. 糖尿病技术:2025年糖尿病照护标准
Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan 1;48(Supplement_1):S146-S166. doi: 10.2337/dc25-S007.
2
Automated insulin delivery systems for the management of insulin therapy in post-transplant diabetes mellitus: a case series from a single center population.用于管理移植后糖尿病胰岛素治疗的自动胰岛素输送系统:来自单一中心人群的病例系列
Acta Diabetol. 2025 Apr;62(4):579-584. doi: 10.1007/s00592-024-02419-6. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
3
Glycaemic outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes over 34 weeks with the Omnipod® 5 Automated Insulin Delivery System.
使用Omnipod® 5自动胰岛素给药系统的2型糖尿病成人患者34周的血糖结果。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Jan;27(1):143-154. doi: 10.1111/dom.15993. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
4
Patient-reported outcomes in studies of diabetes technology: What matters.糖尿病技术研究中的患者报告结局:重要的因素
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 Dec;26 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):59-73. doi: 10.1111/dom.15858. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
5
7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.7. 糖尿病技术:2024年糖尿病护理标准
Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(Suppl 1):S126-S144. doi: 10.2337/dc24-S007.
6
Current Technologies for Managing Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Their Impact on Quality of Life-A Narrative Review.1型糖尿病管理的当前技术及其对生活质量的影响——一项叙述性综述
Life (Basel). 2023 Jul 30;13(8):1663. doi: 10.3390/life13081663.
7
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion vs. Multiple Daily Injections in Type-2 Diabetes.一项关于 2 型糖尿病患者持续皮下胰岛素输注与多次皮下注射胰岛素治疗的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jan 10;59(1):141. doi: 10.3390/medicina59010141.
8
7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023.7. 糖尿病技术:2023 年糖尿病护理标准。
Diabetes Care. 2023 Jan 1;46(Suppl 1):S111-S127. doi: 10.2337/dc23-S007.
9
Bench-Side Dose Accuracy of an Open-Source Ultra-Low-Cost Insulin-Pump, With Testing Conducted to IEC 60601-2-24.经 IEC 60601-2-24 测试的开源超低成本胰岛素泵的台边剂量准确性。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 May;18(3):709-713. doi: 10.1177/19322968221142316. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
10
A pharmacological approach assessing the role of mast cells in insulin infusion site inflammation.评估肥大细胞在胰岛素输注部位炎症中作用的药理学方法。
Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2022 Jul;12(7):1711-1718. doi: 10.1007/s13346-021-01070-w. Epub 2021 Sep 24.