Suppr超能文献

颅内动脉粥样硬化性亚急性缺血性卒中强化血压控制可能不安全:一项随机试验结果。

Intensive blood pressure control may not be safe in subacute ischemic stroke by intracranial atherosclerosis: a result of randomized trial.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Eulji General Hospital, Eulji University, Daejeon.

Department of Neurology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 2018 Sep;36(9):1936-1941. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001784.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Current guideline recommends intensive blood pressure (BP) control in hypertensive patients, but the appropriate target BP level after ischemic stroke due to intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis remains uncertain.

METHODS

In this randomized, single-blinded trial, patients with symptomatic internal carotid or middle cerebral artery steno-occlusion (>50%) within 7-42 days after index stroke received intensive (target SBP < 120 mmHg) or modest (target SBP < 140 mmHg) BP control from April 2010 to December 2012. The primary outcome was the change in ischemic lesion volume in white matter lesions at the whole forebrain between baseline and 24 weeks as measured from fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR) images, which was tested in noninferiority test (noninferiority margin of 3 cm).

RESULTS

Among 132 patients, follow-up FLAIR images were available in 111 (59 in the intensive and 52 in the moderate BP control groups). After 24 weeks, the SBP in the intensive group was significantly lower (124.6 ± 10.5 mmHg) than in the modest group (132.3 ± 10.6 mmHg). The ischemic lesion volume increased more in the intensive group (4.9 ± 18.3 cm) than the modest group (2.2 ± 8.2 cm), which failed to prove noninferiority. The frequency of new ischemic lesions on 24-week FLAIR images was nonsignificantly higher in the intensive group than the modest group [10 (16.9%) vs. 5 (9.6%), respectively; P = 0.26)]. Only one recurrent stroke developed during the study period in each group.

CONCLUSION

Intensive BP control in intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis patients failed to prove noninferiority compared with modest BP control, and may increase ischemic lesion volume in the subacute stage.

摘要

目的

目前的指南建议高血压患者进行强化血压(BP)控制,但颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄引起的缺血性卒中后合适的目标 BP 水平仍不确定。

方法

在这项随机、单盲试验中,在索引性卒中后 7-42 天内患有症状性颈内或大脑中动脉狭窄闭塞(>50%)的患者接受强化(目标 SBP<120mmHg)或适度(目标 SBP<140mmHg)BP 控制。主要结局是在 24 周时从液体衰减反转恢复(FLAIR)图像测量的整个前脑的白质病变中缺血性病变体积的变化,这在非劣效性试验中进行了测试(非劣效性边界为 3cm)。

结果

在 132 例患者中,111 例(强化组 59 例,适度组 52 例)有随访 FLAIR 图像。24 周后,强化组的 SBP 明显低于适度组(124.6±10.5mmHg 比 132.3±10.6mmHg)。强化组的缺血性病变体积增加更多(4.9±18.3cm)比适度组(2.2±8.2cm),未能证明非劣效性。强化组在 24 周时的新缺血性病变的发生率高于适度组[10 例(16.9%)比 5 例(9.6%);P=0.26]。在研究期间,每组只有 1 例复发性卒中。

结论

与适度 BP 控制相比,强化 BP 控制在颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄患者中未能证明非劣效性,并且可能会增加亚急性期的缺血性病变体积。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验