Suppr超能文献

决策辅助工具对前列腺癌筛查偏好的影响:一项随机调查研究。

The Influence of Decision Aids on Prostate Cancer Screening Preferences: A Randomized Survey Study.

机构信息

Departments of Urology and Medical Social Sciences (DEV), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

Departments of Urology and Medical Social Sciences (DEV), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

J Urol. 2018 Nov;200(5):1048-1055. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.05.093. Epub 2018 May 29.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Shared decision making is recommended in regard to prostate cancer screening. Decision aids may facilitate this process but the impact of decision aids on screening preferences is poorly understood.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In an online survey we randomized a national sample of adults to the online decision aids of 1 of 6 professional societies. We compared survey responses before and after decision aid exposure. The primary outcome was the change in participant likelihood of undergoing or recommending prostate cancer screening on a scale of 1-unlikely to 100-extremely likely. Secondary outcomes included change in participant comfort with prostate cancer screening based on the average of 6, 5-point Likert-scale questions.

RESULTS

Median age was 53 years in the 1,336 participants and 50% were men. The randomized groups did not differ significantly by race, age, gender, income, marital status or education level. The likelihood of undergoing or recommending prostate cancer screening decreased from 83 to 78 following decision aid exposure (p <0.001). Reviewing the decision aid from the Centers for Disease Control or the American Academy of Family Physicians did not alter the likelihood (each p >0.2). However, the decision aid from the United States Preventive Services Task Force was associated with the largest decrease in screening preference (-16.0, p <0.001). Participants reported increased comfort (from 3.5 to 4.1 of 5) with the decision making process of prostate cancer screening following exposure to a decision aid (p <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Exposure to a decision aid decreased the participant likelihood of undergoing or recommending prostate cancer screening and increased comfort with the screening process.

摘要

目的

建议在前列腺癌筛查方面进行共同决策。决策辅助工具可以促进这一过程,但决策辅助工具对筛查偏好的影响知之甚少。

材料和方法

在一项在线调查中,我们将全国成年人样本随机分配到 6 个专业协会的在线决策辅助工具中。我们比较了决策辅助工具暴露前后的调查结果。主要结果是参与者进行或推荐前列腺癌筛查的可能性变化,范围为 1-极不可能,100-极有可能。次要结果包括根据 6 个 5 分李克特量表问题的平均值,参与者对前列腺癌筛查的舒适度变化。

结果

1336 名参与者的中位年龄为 53 岁,其中 50%为男性。随机分组在种族、年龄、性别、收入、婚姻状况或教育水平方面没有显著差异。在决策辅助工具暴露后,进行或推荐前列腺癌筛查的可能性从 83 降至 78(p<0.001)。查看疾病控制中心或美国家庭医生学会的决策辅助工具并没有改变这种可能性(p>0.2)。然而,美国预防服务工作组的决策辅助工具与筛查偏好的最大降幅(-16.0,p<0.001)相关。参与者报告说,在接触决策辅助工具后,他们对前列腺癌筛查决策过程的舒适度(从 3.5 提高到 4.1)增加(p<0.001)。

结论

接触决策辅助工具降低了参与者进行或推荐前列腺癌筛查的可能性,并增加了对筛查过程的舒适度。

相似文献

1
The Influence of Decision Aids on Prostate Cancer Screening Preferences: A Randomized Survey Study.
J Urol. 2018 Nov;200(5):1048-1055. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.05.093. Epub 2018 May 29.
2
A comparison of web-based versus print-based decision AIDS for prostate cancer screening: participants' evaluation and utilization.
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Jan;30(1):33-42. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2994-7. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
4
Patient education on prostate cancer screening and involvement in decision making.
Ann Fam Med. 2007 Mar-Apr;5(2):112-9. doi: 10.1370/afm.623.
6
8
Online prostate cancer screening decision aid for at-risk men: a randomized trial.
Health Psychol. 2014 Sep;33(9):986-97. doi: 10.1037/a0034405. Epub 2013 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of an Online Decision Aid for Selection of Contraceptive Methods.
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Jan;14(1):153-163. doi: 10.1055/a-2004-2304. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
2
Harms and Benefits of Cancer Screening.
Recent Results Cancer Res. 2021;218:85-104. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-63749-1_7.

本文引用的文献

1
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
2
Prostate cancer screening decision-making in three states: 2013 behavioral risk factor surveillance system analysis.
Cancer Causes Control. 2017 Mar;28(3):235-240. doi: 10.1007/s10552-017-0860-8. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
4
Trends in Metastatic Breast and Prostate Cancer--Lessons in Cancer Dynamics.
N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 29;373(18):1685-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1510443.
5
Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of prostate cancer.
Eur Urol. 2014 Jun;65(6):1046-55. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.062. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
6
Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA Guideline.
J Urol. 2013 Aug;190(2):419-26. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.119. Epub 2013 May 6.
7
ResearchMatch: a national registry to recruit volunteers for clinical research.
Acad Med. 2012 Jan;87(1):66-73. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31823ab7d2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验