Moran John L, Solomon Patricia J
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA, Australia.
School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Crit Care Resusc. 2018 Jun;20(2):85-93.
The search for biomarkers has been described as a dismal patchwork of fragmented research. We review biomarkers in sepsis in the critically ill in terms of conventional single circulating proteins. Despite sepsis biomarker publications trebling over the past 6 years, currently only one, procalcitonin, has materialised promise. We survey genomic biomarker initiatives, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and gene signatures. Despite many SNP associations with sepsis susceptibility and a limited number of genome-wide association studies, the status of these associations is that of genomic signposts only. The standing of gene signatures in the paradigmatic discipline, breast cancer, is described. Uncertainties in the understanding of the sepsis process are documented - the dissociation between blood and tissue element activity, or compartmentalisation. The paradox of the active search for gene signatures to refine the sepsis phenotype and discover target subtypes for new therapies in the absence of such therapies is presented.
寻找生物标志物的过程被形容为零散研究拼凑而成的惨淡局面。我们从传统的单一循环蛋白角度审视危重症患者脓毒症中的生物标志物。尽管在过去6年里脓毒症生物标志物的相关出版物数量增至三倍,但目前只有降钙素原这一种生物标志物展现出了前景。我们调查了基因组生物标志物计划、单核苷酸多态性(SNP)和基因特征。尽管有许多SNP与脓毒症易感性相关,且全基因组关联研究数量有限,但这些关联目前仅处于基因组路标阶段。文中描述了基因特征在典型学科乳腺癌中的地位。记录了对脓毒症过程理解中的不确定性——血液与组织成分活性之间的分离或分隔。文中还提出了一个悖论,即在尚无新疗法的情况下,积极寻找基因特征以优化脓毒症表型并发现新疗法的目标亚型。