Suppr超能文献

希腊创伤救治体系:路在何方?

Trauma system in Greece: Quo Vadis?

机构信息

Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, 4 Newark St, Whitechapel, E1 2AT, London, UK; 401 General Military Hospital of Athens, P. Kanellopoulou Ave., Athens, 11525, Greece.

1st Propaedeutic Surgical Clinic, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 114 Vasilissis Sofias Avenue, Athens, 11527, Greece.

出版信息

Injury. 2018 Jul;49(7):1243-1250. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.05.022. Epub 2018 May 23.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Implementation of trauma systems has markedly assisted in improving outcomes of the injured patient. However, differences exist internationally as diverse social factors, economic conditions and national particularities are placing obstacles. The purpose of this paper is to critically evaluate the current Greek trauma system, provide a comprehensive review and suggest key actions.

METHODS

An exhaustive search of the - scarce on this subject - English and Greek literature was carried out to analyze all the main components of the Greek trauma system, according to American College of Surgeons' criteria, as well as the WHO Trauma Systems Maturity Index.

RESULTS

Regarding prevention, efforts are in the right direction lowering the road traffic incidents-related death rate, however rural and insular regions remain behind. Hellenic Emergency Medical Service (EKAB) has well-defined communications and emergency phone line but faces problems with educating people on how to use it properly. In addition, equal and systematic training of ambulance personnel is a challenge, with the lack of pre-hospital registry and EMS quality assessment posing a question on where the related services are currently standing. Redistribution of facilities' roles with the establishment of the first formal trauma centre in the existing infrastructure would facilitate the development of a national registry and introduction of the trauma surgeon subspecialty with proper training potential. Definite rehabilitation institutional protocols that include both inpatient and outpatient care are needed. Disaster preparedness entails an extensive national plan and regular drills, mainly at the pre-hospital level. The lack, however, of any accompanying quality assurance programs hampers the effort to yield the desirable results.

CONCLUSION

Despite recent economic crisis in Greece, actions solving logistics and organising issues may offer a well-defined, integrated trauma system without uncontrollably raising the costs. Political will is needed for reforms that use pre-existing infrastructure and working power in a more efficient way, with a first line priority being the establishment of the first major trauma centre that could function as the cornerstone for the building of the Greek trauma system.

摘要

简介

创伤系统的实施显著有助于改善受伤患者的预后。然而,由于不同的社会因素、经济条件和国家特殊性,国际上存在差异,这给创伤系统的实施带来了障碍。本文旨在批判性地评估当前希腊的创伤系统,对其进行全面评估,并提出关键行动。

方法

根据美国外科医师学院的标准以及世界卫生组织创伤系统成熟度指数,对希腊创伤系统的所有主要组成部分进行了全面评估。为此,我们对英语和希腊文献进行了详尽的搜索,同时还对这一主题的相关文献进行了搜索。

结果

在预防方面,希腊在降低道路交通事件相关死亡率方面做出了努力,但农村和岛屿地区仍落后于其他地区。希腊紧急医疗服务(EKAB)的通讯和紧急电话线路明确,但在如何正确使用这些线路方面,希腊还需加强对民众的教育。此外,如何平等和系统地培训急救人员是一个挑战,由于缺乏院前登记和 EMS 质量评估,人们对相关服务的现状提出了质疑。在现有基础设施中建立第一个正式的创伤中心,重新分配设施的角色,将有助于建立国家登记系统和引入有适当培训潜力的创伤外科专科。还需要制定明确的康复机构协议,包括住院和门诊护理。灾难准备需要一个广泛的国家计划和定期演习,特别是在院前一级。然而,缺乏任何配套的质量保证计划,阻碍了取得理想结果的努力。

结论

尽管希腊最近经历了经济危机,但采取行动解决物流和组织问题可能会提供一个明确的、综合的创伤系统,而不会不可控地增加成本。需要进行改革,利用现有的基础设施和工作力量,以更有效的方式发挥作用,这需要政治意愿,希腊创伤系统建设的第一步是建立第一个主要创伤中心,作为建立希腊创伤系统的基石。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验