School of Environment, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, 210046, China.
CAS Key Laboratory of Urban Pollutants Conversion, Department of Chemistry, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, China.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Aug;25(23):22810-22817. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2317-3. Epub 2018 May 31.
Reversed AO process (anoxic-anaerobic-aerobic) and conventional AO process (anaerobic-anoxic-aerobic) are widely used in many wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in Asia. However, at present, there are still no consistent results to figure out which process has better total phosphorous (TP) removal performance and the mechanism for this difference was not clear yet. In this study, the treatment performances of both processes were compared in the same full-scale WWTP and the TP removal dynamics was analyzed by a modeling method. The treatment performance of full-scale WWTP showed the TP removal efficiency of the reversed AO process was more efficient than in the conventional AO process. The modeling results further reveal that the TP removal depends highly on the concentration and composition of influent COD. It had more efficient TP removal than the conventional AO process only under conditions of sufficient influent COD and high fermentation products content. This study may lay a foundation for appropriate selection and optimization of treatment processes to suit practical wastewater properties.
反硝化除磷(缺氧-厌氧-好氧)和传统的除磷(厌氧-缺氧-好氧)工艺被广泛应用于亚洲的许多污水处理厂(WWTP)。然而,目前还没有一致的结果来确定哪种工艺具有更好的总磷(TP)去除性能,并且这种差异的机制尚不清楚。在本研究中,在同一个全规模的污水处理厂中比较了这两种工艺的处理性能,并通过建模方法分析了 TP 去除动力学。全规模污水处理厂的处理性能表明,反硝化除磷工艺的 TP 去除效率比传统的除磷工艺更高效。模型结果进一步表明,TP 的去除高度依赖于进水 COD 的浓度和组成。只有在进水 COD 充足且发酵产物含量高的情况下,该工艺才能比传统的除磷工艺更有效地去除 TP。本研究可能为根据实际废水性质选择和优化处理工艺奠定基础。