El-Deeb H A, Mobarak E H
Oper Dent. 2018 Nov/Dec;43(6):665-673. doi: 10.2341/17-154-L. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
: The use of high-viscosity glass-ionomer cements (HVGICs) for atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations is widely practiced with the advent of various HVGICs. However, the bonding of the latter to caries-affected dentin (CAD) should be validated, especially because it is the common substrate left after conservative caries removal following the ART approach. Hence, this study was carried out to evaluate the microshear bond strength (μSBS) of three HVGICs to normal dentin (ND) and CAD under intrapulpal pressure (IPP) simulation.
: The occlusal enamel of 90 molars with mid-coronal caries was cut to expose flat dentin surfaces containing both ND and CAD. Dentin substrates (ND and CAD) were differentiated using visual, tactile, caries-detecting dye, and dye-permeability methods. Prepared crown segments were equally divided (n=30) according to the tested HVGICs into GC Fuji IX GP Fast, Fuji IX GP containing chlorhexidine, and zinc-reinforced ChemFil Rock HVGIC. Microcylinders of tested HVGICs were built up on both dentin substrates (n=30 for each tested HVGIC per each substrate) using starch tubes while the specimens were subjected to simulated IPP of 15 mm Hg. The μSBS test was conducted using a universal testing machine, and failure modes were determined using a scanning electron microscope. Data were statistically analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures, one-way ANOVA, and Bonferroni post hoc tests (α=0.05).
: For both dentin substrates (ND and CAD), the μSBS values of ChemFil Rock were significantly higher than those recorded for the other HVGICs. The μSBS values of each tested HVGIC to ND and CAD were not statistically different. Failure modes were mainly mixed.
: Zinc-reinforced HVGIC ChemFil Rock showed superior bonding to ND and CAD compared to the GC Fuji IX GP Fast and Fuji IX with chlorhexidine. However, each of the tested HVGICs showed comparable bonding to both dentin substrates (ND and CAD).
随着各种高粘度玻璃离子水门汀(HVGICs)的出现,其在非创伤性修复治疗(ART)修复中的应用已广泛开展。然而,后者与龋损牙本质(CAD)的粘结性能应得到验证,特别是因为它是采用ART方法保守去龋后留下的常见底物。因此,本研究旨在评估三种HVGICs在模拟牙髓腔内压力(IPP)下与正常牙本质(ND)和CAD的微剪切粘结强度(μSBS)。
将90颗患有中冠龋的磨牙的咬合面釉质磨除,以暴露包含ND和CAD的平坦牙本质表面。使用视觉、触觉、龋齿检测染料和染料渗透性方法区分牙本质底物(ND和CAD)。根据测试的HVGICs将制备好的牙冠段平均分为三组(n = 30),分别为GC Fuji IX GP Fast、含洗必泰的Fuji IX GP和锌增强的ChemFil Rock HVGIC。在两个牙本质底物上使用淀粉管构建测试的HVGICs的微圆柱体(每个底物上每种测试的HVGIC n = 30),同时使样本承受15 mmHg的模拟IPP。使用万能试验机进行μSBS测试,并使用扫描电子显微镜确定失效模式。数据采用重复测量的双向方差分析(ANOVA)、单向ANOVA和Bonferroni事后检验进行统计学分析(α = 0.05)。
对于两种牙本质底物(ND和CAD),ChemFil Rock的μSBS值显著高于其他HVGICs记录的值。每种测试的HVGIC对ND和CAD的μSBS值在统计学上没有差异。失效模式主要是混合性的。
与GC Fuji IX GP Fast和含洗必泰的Fuji IX相比,锌增强的HVGIC ChemFil Rock对ND和CAD表现出更好的粘结性能。然而,每种测试的HVGIC对两种牙本质底物(ND和CAD)的粘结性能相当。