Georgetown University, Department of Psychology, USA.
University of Chicago, Department of Psychology, USA; Barnard College, President's Office, USA.
Neuroimage. 2018 Sep;178:503-518. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.062. Epub 2018 May 30.
How the brain encodes abstract numerical symbols is a fundamental question in philosophy and cognitive neuroscience alike. Here we probe the nature of symbolic number representation in the brain by characterizing the neural similarity space for symbolic quantities in regions sensitive to their semantic content. In parietal and occipital regions, the similarity space of number symbols was positively predicted by the lexical frequency of numerals in parietal and occipital areas, and was unrelated to numerical ratio. These results are more consistent with a categorical, frequency-based account of symbolic quantity encoding. In contrast, the similarity space of analog quantities was positively predicted by ratio in prefrontal, parietal and occipital regions. We thus provide an explanation for why previous work has indicated that symbolic and analog quantities are distinct: number symbols operate primarily like discrete categories sensitive to input frequency, while analog quantities operate more like approximate perceptual magnitudes. In addition, we find substantial evidence for related patterns of activity across formats in prefrontal, parietal and occipital regions. Crucially however, between-format relations were not specific to individual quantities, indicating common processing as opposed to common representation. Moreover, evidence for between-format processing was strongest for quantities that could be represented as exact, discrete values in both systems (quantities in the 'subitizing' range: 1-4). In sum, converging evidence presented here indicates that symbolic quantities are coded in the brain as discrete categories sensitive to input frequency and largely independent of approximate, analog quantities.
大脑如何对抽象的数字符号进行编码,这是哲学和认知神经科学领域的一个基本问题。在这里,我们通过刻画对符号数量敏感的区域中符号数量的神经相似性空间,来探究大脑中符号数量的表示性质。在顶叶和枕叶区域中,数量符号的相似性空间与顶叶和枕叶区域中数字的词汇频率呈正相关,而与数字比例无关。这些结果更符合符号数量编码的基于范畴和基于频率的解释。相比之下,模拟数量的相似性空间与前额叶、顶叶和枕叶区域的比例呈正相关。因此,我们为为什么之前的研究表明符号数量和模拟数量是不同的提供了一个解释:数字符号主要像对输入频率敏感的离散类别一样运作,而模拟数量则更像近似的感知大小。此外,我们在前额叶、顶叶和枕叶区域中发现了大量跨格式活动的相关模式的证据。然而,至关重要的是,跨格式关系并非特定于单个数量,这表明存在共同的处理而不是共同的表示。此外,在两个系统中都可以表示为精确离散值的数量(“亚数量”范围的数量:1-4)的格式之间的处理证据最强。总之,这里提出的一致证据表明,大脑中对符号数量的编码是作为对输入频率敏感的离散范畴,并且在很大程度上独立于近似的模拟数量。