Suppr超能文献

定量评估患者对乳房症状门诊转诊的偏好:一项决策分析研究。

Quantifying patient preferences for symptomatic breast clinic referral: a decision analysis study.

机构信息

HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

Department of Clinical Therapies, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 May 31;8(5):e017286. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017286.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Decision analysis study that incorporates patient preferences and probability estimates to investigate the impact of women's preferences for referral or an alternative strategy of watchful waiting if faced with symptoms that could be due to breast cancer.

SETTING

Community-based study.

PARTICIPANTS

Asymptomatic women aged 30-60 years.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were presented with 11 health scenarios that represent the possible consequences of symptomatic breast problems. Participants were asked the risk of death that they were willing to take in order to avoid the health scenario using the standard gamble utility method. This process was repeated for all 11 health scenarios. Formal decision analysis for the preferred individual decision was then estimated for each participant.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

The preferred diagnostic strategy was either watchful waiting or referral to a breast clinic. Sensitivity analysis was used to examine how each varied according to changes in the probabilities of the health scenarios.

RESULTS

A total of 35 participants completed the interviews, with a median age 41 years (IQR 35-47 years). The majority of the study sample was employed (n=32, 91.4%), with a third-level (university) education (n=32, 91.4%) and with knowledge of someone with breast cancer (n=30, 85.7%). When individual preferences were accounted for, 25 (71.4%) patients preferred watchful waiting to referral for triple assessment as their preferred initial diagnostic strategy. Sensitivity analysis shows that referral for triple assessment becomes the dominant strategy at the upper probability estimate (18%) of breast cancer in the community.

CONCLUSIONS

Watchful waiting is an acceptable strategy for most women who present to their general practitioner (GP) with breast symptoms. These findings suggest that current referral guidelines should take more explicit account of women's preferences in relation to their GPs initial management strategy.

摘要

目的

采用决策分析研究,纳入患者偏好和概率估计值,以调查女性在面临可能与乳腺癌相关的症状时,对于转诊或替代策略(即观察等待)的偏好所产生的影响。

背景

基于社区的研究。

参与者

年龄 30-60 岁的无症状女性。

干预措施

向参与者呈现 11 种健康状况场景,这些场景代表了有症状的乳腺问题可能带来的后果。参与者被要求使用标准博弈效用法,回答为避免健康状况场景而愿意承担的死亡风险。对所有 11 种健康状况场景重复此过程。然后为每位参与者估算首选个体决策的正式决策分析。

主要观察指标

首选的诊断策略是观察等待或转诊至乳腺科。采用敏感性分析来检查每个参与者的偏好诊断策略如何根据健康状况场景概率的变化而变化。

结果

共有 35 名参与者完成了访谈,中位年龄为 41 岁(IQR 35-47 岁)。研究样本的大多数参与者为在职人员(n=32,91.4%),具有大学(n=32,91.4%)或以上教育程度,并且认识乳腺癌患者(n=30,85.7%)。当考虑个体偏好时,25 名(71.4%)患者将观察等待作为首选的初始诊断策略,首选观察等待而非三重评估转诊。敏感性分析表明,在社区中乳腺癌的概率估计值较高(18%)时,三重评估转诊成为主导策略。

结论

观察等待是大多数向全科医生(GP)就诊的女性出现乳腺症状时可接受的策略。这些发现表明,目前的转诊指南应更明确地考虑女性对其 GP 初始管理策略的偏好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9706/5988058/b9f8ec45bedd/bmjopen-2017-017286f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验