• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2000-2007 年澳大利亚、加拿大、丹麦、挪威、瑞典和英国的乳腺癌生存状况和诊断时分期:一项基于人群的研究。

Breast cancer survival and stage at diagnosis in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK, 2000-2007: a population-based study.

机构信息

Cancer Research UK Cancer Survival Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2013 Mar 19;108(5):1195-208. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.6. Epub 2013 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1038/bjc.2013.6
PMID:23449362
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3619080/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We investigate whether differences in breast cancer survival in six high-income countries can be explained by differences in stage at diagnosis using routine data from population-based cancer registries.

METHODS

We analysed the data on 257,362 women diagnosed with breast cancer during 2000-7 and registered in 13 population-based cancer registries in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK. Flexible parametric hazard models were used to estimate net survival and the excess hazard of dying from breast cancer up to 3 years after diagnosis.

RESULTS

Age-standardised 3-year net survival was 87-89% in the UK and Denmark, and 91-94% in the other four countries. Stage at diagnosis was relatively advanced in Denmark: only 30% of women had Tumour, Nodes, Metastasis (TNM) stage I disease, compared with 42-45% elsewhere. Women in the UK had low survival for TNM stage III-IV disease compared with other countries.

CONCLUSION

International differences in breast cancer survival are partly explained by differences in stage at diagnosis, and partly by differences in stage-specific survival. Low overall survival arises if the stage distribution is adverse (e.g. Denmark) but stage-specific survival is normal; or if the stage distribution is typical but stage-specific survival is low (e.g. UK). International differences in staging diagnostics and stage-specific cancer therapies should be investigated.

摘要

背景

我们通过使用来自澳大利亚、加拿大、丹麦、挪威、瑞典和英国的 13 个基于人群的癌症登记处的常规数据,调查了六个高收入国家之间乳腺癌生存率的差异是否可以用诊断时的分期差异来解释。

方法

我们分析了 2000-2007 年间在澳大利亚、加拿大、丹麦、挪威、瑞典和英国的 13 个基于人群的癌症登记处登记的 257362 名乳腺癌确诊女性的数据。使用灵活的参数风险模型来估计诊断后 3 年内的净生存率和死于乳腺癌的超额风险。

结果

英国和丹麦的 3 年标准化净生存率为 87-89%,其他四个国家为 91-94%。丹麦的诊断时分期相对较晚:仅有 30%的女性患有肿瘤、淋巴结、转移(TNM)I 期疾病,而其他地方的比例为 42-45%。与其他国家相比,英国的 TNM Ⅲ-Ⅳ期疾病的生存率较低。

结论

乳腺癌生存率的国际差异部分是由诊断时的分期差异解释的,部分是由特定分期的生存率差异解释的。如果分期分布不利(如丹麦)但特定分期的生存率正常,则会出现总体生存率较低的情况;或者如果分期分布典型但特定分期的生存率较低(如英国),也会出现总体生存率较低的情况。应调查国际间在分期诊断和特定阶段癌症治疗方面的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d21/3619080/b517dc9ea7eb/bjc20136f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d21/3619080/746524a7b71a/bjc20136f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d21/3619080/2af976a0c4ce/bjc20136f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d21/3619080/b517dc9ea7eb/bjc20136f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d21/3619080/746524a7b71a/bjc20136f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d21/3619080/2af976a0c4ce/bjc20136f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d21/3619080/b517dc9ea7eb/bjc20136f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Breast cancer survival and stage at diagnosis in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK, 2000-2007: a population-based study.2000-2007 年澳大利亚、加拿大、丹麦、挪威、瑞典和英国的乳腺癌生存状况和诊断时分期:一项基于人群的研究。
Br J Cancer. 2013 Mar 19;108(5):1195-208. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.6. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
2
Lung cancer survival and stage at diagnosis in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK: a population-based study, 2004-2007.澳大利亚、加拿大、丹麦、挪威、瑞典和英国的肺癌生存和诊断时分期:基于人群的研究,2004-2007 年。
Thorax. 2013 Jun;68(6):551-64. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-202297. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
3
Stage at diagnosis and colorectal cancer survival in six high-income countries: a population-based study of patients diagnosed during 2000-2007.诊断时的分期与 6 个高收入国家的结直肠癌生存情况:2000-2007 年间确诊患者的基于人群研究。
Acta Oncol. 2013 Jun;52(5):919-32. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.764008. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
4
Stage at diagnosis and ovarian cancer survival: evidence from the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership.诊断时的分期与卵巢癌生存:来自国际癌症基准合作计划的证据。
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Oct;127(1):75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.06.033. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
5
Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995-2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data.澳大利亚、加拿大、丹麦、挪威、瑞典和英国的癌症生存状况,1995-2007 年(国际癌症基准合作):基于人群的癌症登记数据分析。
Lancet. 2011 Jan 8;377(9760):127-38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62231-3. Epub 2010 Dec 21.
6
Differences in cancer awareness and beliefs between Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): do they contribute to differences in cancer survival?澳大利亚、加拿大、丹麦、挪威、瑞典和英国(国际癌症基准合作组织)之间的癌症认知和信念差异:它们是否导致癌症生存率的差异?
Br J Cancer. 2013 Feb 5;108(2):292-300. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.542. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
7
Comparability of stage data in cancer registries in six countries: lessons from the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership.癌症登记处的分期数据在六个国家的可比性:国际癌症基准合作关系的经验教训。
Int J Cancer. 2013 Feb 1;132(3):676-85. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27651. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
8
Surgical treatment and survival from colorectal cancer in Denmark, England, Norway, and Sweden: a population-based study.丹麦、英国、挪威和瑞典的结直肠癌的外科治疗和生存情况:一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20(1):74-87. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30646-6. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
9
Colon and rectal cancer survival in seven high-income countries 2010-2014: variation by age and stage at diagnosis (the ICBP SURVMARK-2 project).2010 - 2014年七个高收入国家的结肠癌和直肠癌生存率:按诊断时年龄和分期的差异(ICBP SURVMARK - 2项目)
Gut. 2021 Jan;70(1):114-126. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-320625. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
10
Exploring variations in ovarian cancer survival by age and stage (ICBP SurvMark-2): A population-based study.探讨年龄和分期对卵巢癌生存的影响(ICBP SurvMark-2):一项基于人群的研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Apr;157(1):234-244. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.12.047. Epub 2020 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Calpain-1 and Calpain-2 Promote Breast Cancer Metastasis.钙蛋白酶-1和钙蛋白酶-2促进乳腺癌转移。
Cells. 2025 Aug 25;14(17):1314. doi: 10.3390/cells14171314.
2
Main challenges to cancer care in Latin America: an analysis through breast cancer lenses.拉丁美洲癌症护理面临的主要挑战:通过乳腺癌视角进行的分析
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025 Jun 12;48:101147. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101147. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
The Interlinking Metabolic Association between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Insights.

本文引用的文献

1
The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.乳腺癌筛查的获益与危害:一项独立评审。
Lancet. 2012 Nov 17;380(9855):1778-86. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61611-0. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
2
The benefits and harms of mammographic screening for breast cancer: building the evidence base using service screening programmes.乳腺钼靶筛查对乳腺癌的利弊:利用服务筛查项目建立证据基础
J Med Screen. 2012;19 Suppl 1:1-2. doi: 10.1258/jms.2012.012074.
3
Breast cancer survival in the US and Europe: a CONCORD high-resolution study.
2型糖尿病与癌症之间的相互关联代谢联系:分子机制与治疗见解
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Sep 25;14(19):2132. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14192132.
4
Survival Outcomes of Breast Cancer Patients in South India Over 20 Years.20 多年来印度南部乳腺癌患者的生存结果。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Aug 1;25(8):2633-2644. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.8.2633.
5
Influence of Breast Cancer Awareness Month on Public Interest of Breast Cancer in High-Income Countries Between 2012 and 2022: Google Trends Analysis.2012年至2022年期间乳腺癌宣传月对高收入国家公众对乳腺癌关注度的影响:谷歌趋势分析
JMIR Cancer. 2024 Aug 12;10:e49197. doi: 10.2196/49197.
6
Incidence and survival of primary metastatic breast cancer in Denmark; implication of breast cancer screening, classification, and staging practice.丹麦原发性转移性乳腺癌的发病率和生存率;乳腺癌筛查、分类和分期实践的影响。
Acta Oncol. 2024 May 6;63:277-287. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2023.37270.
7
Lead-Time Corrected Effect on Breast Cancer Survival in Germany by Mode of Detection.德国乳腺癌生存的提前期校正检测方式效应
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 28;16(7):1326. doi: 10.3390/cancers16071326.
8
Investigating the role of county-level colorectal cancer screening rates on stage at diagnosis of colorectal cancer in rural Georgia.调查佐治亚州农村地区县级结直肠癌筛查率对结直肠癌诊断分期的影响。
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Aug;35(8):1123-1131. doi: 10.1007/s10552-024-01874-4. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
9
Comparative examination of breast cancer burden in sub-Saharan Africa, 1990-2019: estimates from Global Burden of Disease 2019 study.撒哈拉以南非洲地区乳腺癌负担的比较研究,1990-2019 年:来自 2019 年全球疾病负担研究的估计。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 29;14(3):e082492. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082492.
10
Risk of cancer and serious disease in Danish patients with urgent referral for serious non-specific symptoms and signs of cancer in Funen 2014-2021.丹麦 2014-2021 年凡岛省癌症和严重疾病患者因严重非特异性癌症症状和体征而紧急转诊的风险。
Br J Cancer. 2024 May;130(8):1304-1315. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02620-y. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
美国和欧洲的乳腺癌生存状况:CONCORD 高分辨率研究。
Int J Cancer. 2013 Mar 1;132(5):1170-81. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27725. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
4
Comparability of stage data in cancer registries in six countries: lessons from the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership.癌症登记处的分期数据在六个国家的可比性:国际癌症基准合作关系的经验教训。
Int J Cancer. 2013 Feb 1;132(3):676-85. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27651. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
5
Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer due to mammography screening: results from the Norwegian screening program.由于乳腺 X 线筛查导致的浸润性乳腺癌过度诊断:来自挪威筛查项目的结果。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Apr 3;156(7):491-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-7-201204030-00005.
6
Breast cancer mortality in neighbouring European countries with different levels of screening but similar access to treatment: trend analysis of WHO mortality database.不同筛查水平但治疗可及性相似的欧洲邻国的乳腺癌死亡率:世卫组织死亡率数据库的趋势分析。
BMJ. 2011 Jul 28;343:d4411. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4411.
7
On estimation in relative survival.关于相对生存的估计
Biometrics. 2012 Mar;68(1):113-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01640.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
8
Quantifying differences in breast cancer survival between England and Norway.量化英格兰和挪威之间乳腺癌生存差异。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;35(6):526-33. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2011.04.003. Epub 2011 May 24.
9
Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice.使用链式方程进行多重插补:实践中的问题和指导。
Stat Med. 2011 Feb 20;30(4):377-99. doi: 10.1002/sim.4067. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
10
Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995-2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data.澳大利亚、加拿大、丹麦、挪威、瑞典和英国的癌症生存状况,1995-2007 年(国际癌症基准合作):基于人群的癌症登记数据分析。
Lancet. 2011 Jan 8;377(9760):127-38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62231-3. Epub 2010 Dec 21.