Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Oncology Clinic, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eur J Haematol. 2018 Sep;101(3):340-348. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13104. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
Quality of life (QoL) has become an important tool to guide decision making in oncology. Given the heterogeneity among hematological cancer survivors, however, clinicians need comparative data across different subsets.
This study recruited survivors of hematological malignancies (≥2.5 years after diagnosis) from 2 German cancer registries. QoL was assessed with the EORTC QLQ-C30. The sample was stratified by cancer type, time since diagnosis, treatment with stem cell transplantation (SCT) and type of SCT. First, levels of QoL were compared across subsamples when controlling for several covariates. Second, we contrasted subsamples with gender- and age-matched population controls obtained from the general population.
Of 2001 survivors contacted by mail, 922 (46%) participated in the study. QoL did not significantly differ between the subsamples. All subsamples scored significantly lower in functioning and significantly higher in symptom burden compared to population controls (all P < .001). Almost all of these group effects reached clinically meaningful sizes (Cohen's d ≥ .5). Group differences in global health/QoL were mostly non-significant.
Hematological cancer survivors are associated with practically relevant impairments irrespective of differences in central medical characteristics. Nevertheless, survivors seem to evaluate their overall situation as relatively well.
生活质量(QoL)已成为肿瘤学决策的重要工具。然而,鉴于血液系统癌症幸存者存在异质性,临床医生需要比较不同亚组之间的对比数据。
本研究招募了来自 2 个德国癌症登记处的血液系统恶性肿瘤幸存者(诊断后≥2.5 年)。使用 EORTC QLQ-C30 评估 QoL。该样本根据癌症类型、诊断后时间、干细胞移植(SCT)治疗和 SCT 类型进行分层。首先,在控制多个协变量的情况下,比较亚组之间的 QoL 水平。其次,我们将亚组与从一般人群中获得的性别和年龄匹配的人群对照进行对比。
通过邮件联系了 2001 名幸存者,其中 922 名(46%)参与了研究。在控制了几个协变量后,亚组之间的 QoL 没有显著差异。与人群对照相比,所有亚组在功能方面的得分明显较低,在症状负担方面的得分明显较高(均 P <.001)。几乎所有这些组间效应都达到了有临床意义的大小(Cohen's d ≥.5)。在总体健康/生活质量方面的组间差异大多不显著。
无论核心医学特征存在差异,血液系统癌症幸存者都与实际相关的损伤有关。然而,幸存者似乎相对较好地评估了他们的整体情况。