• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后年龄与非计划再入院之间的关系(来自全国再入院数据库的研究结果)

Relation Between Age and Unplanned Readmissions After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Findings from the Nationwide Readmission Database).

作者信息

Kwok Chun Shing, Rao Sunil V, Gilchrist Ian, Martinez Sara C, Al Ayoubi Fakhr, Potts Jessica, Rashid Muhammad, Kontopantelis Evangelos, Myint Phyo K, Mamas Mamas A

机构信息

Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom; Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom.

Department of Cardiology, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2018 Jul 15;122(2):220-228. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.03.367. Epub 2018 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.03.367
PMID:29861049
Abstract

It is unclear how age affects rates and causes of unplanned early readmissions after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We analyzed patients in the Nationwide Readmission Database in the United States from 2010 to 2014 and examined the impact of age on readmissions after PCI. The primary outcomes were age-specific 30-day rates and causes of unplanned readmissions. A total of 2,294,345 procedures were analyzed with a 9.6% unplanned readmission rate within 30 days. Unplanned readmissions were 8.1%, 8.1%, 9.5%, and 12.6% for age groups <55, 55.0 to 64.9, 65.0-74.9, and ≥75 years, respectively. With increasing age, there was an increase in the rate of noncardiac causes for readmissions (for ages <55, 55.0 to 64.9, and ≥75 years, the rates were 54.1%, 54.8%, 56.6%, and 57.1%, respectively; p <0.001). Older age was associated with an increased prevalence of infections (13.9% ≥75 years vs 7.7% <55 years), gastrointestinal disease (11.5% ≥75 years vs 9.5% <55 years), and bleeding (7.4% ≥75 years vs 2.9% <55 years) as causes for noncardiac readmissions and a reduced prevalence of nonspecific chest pain (9.9% ≥75 years vs 31.4% <55 years). For cardiac causes, older age was associated with increased prevalence for readmissions due to heart failure (34.6% ≥75 years vs 11.9% <55 years) but a reduced prevalence of coronary artery disease, including angina (25.7% ≥75 years vs 51.3% <55 years). In conclusion, older patients have the highest rates of unplanned 30-day readmissions after PCI, with different causes for readmission compared with younger patients. Interventions designed to reduce readmissions after PCI should be age specific.

摘要

目前尚不清楚年龄如何影响经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后计划外早期再入院率及原因。我们分析了2010年至2014年美国全国再入院数据库中的患者,并研究了年龄对PCI后再入院的影响。主要结局是特定年龄的30天计划外再入院率及原因。共分析了2,294,345例手术,30天内计划外再入院率为9.6%。年龄<55岁、55.0至64.9岁、65.0 - 74.9岁和≥75岁年龄组的计划外再入院率分别为8.1%、8.1%、9.5%和12.6%。随着年龄增长,非心脏原因导致的再入院率增加(年龄<55岁、55.0至64.9岁和≥75岁的比率分别为54.1%、54.8%、56.6%和57.1%;p<0.001)。年龄较大与感染(≥75岁为13.9%,<55岁为7.7%)、胃肠道疾病(≥75岁为11.5%,<55岁为9.5%)和出血(≥75岁为7.4%,<55岁为2.9%)作为非心脏再入院原因的患病率增加以及非特异性胸痛患病率降低(≥75岁为9.9%,<55岁为31.4%)相关。对于心脏原因,年龄较大与因心力衰竭导致的再入院患病率增加(≥75岁为34.6%,<55岁为11.9%)相关,但冠状动脉疾病(包括心绞痛)的患病率降低(≥75岁为25.7%,<55岁为51.3%)。总之,老年患者PCI后30天计划外再入院率最高,与年轻患者相比,再入院原因不同。旨在降低PCI后再入院率的干预措施应针对不同年龄。

相似文献

1
Relation Between Age and Unplanned Readmissions After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Findings from the Nationwide Readmission Database).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后年龄与非计划再入院之间的关系(来自全国再入院数据库的研究结果)
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Jul 15;122(2):220-228. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.03.367. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
2
Effect of Gender on Unplanned Readmissions After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (from the Nationwide Readmissions Database).性别对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后非计划再入院的影响(来自全国再入院数据库)
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Apr 1;121(7):810-817. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.12.032. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
3
Timing and Causes of Unplanned Readmissions After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the Nationwide Readmission Database.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后计划性再入院的时间和原因:来自全国再入院数据库的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 22;12(8):734-748. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
4
Effect of Comorbidity On Unplanned Readmissions After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (From The Nationwide Readmission Database).合并症对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(从全国再入院数据库)后非计划性再入院的影响。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 24;8(1):11156. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29303-y.
5
Nonspecific Chest Pain and 30-Day Unplanned Readmissions in the United States (From the Nationwide Readmission Database).美国的非特异性胸痛与 30 天内非计划性再入院(来自全国再入院数据库)。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Apr 15;123(8):1343-1350. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
6
Burden of 30-Day Readmissions After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in 833,344 Patients in the United States: Predictors, Causes, and Cost: Insights From the Nationwide Readmission Database.美国 833344 例经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 30 天再入院负担:预测因素、原因和费用:来自全国再入院数据库的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Apr 9;11(7):665-674. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.01.248.
7
Percutaneous coronary intervention and 30-day unplanned readmission with chest pain in the United States (Nationwide Readmissions Database).美国(全国再入院数据库)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与 30 天内计划性胸痛再入院
Clin Cardiol. 2021 Mar;44(3):291-306. doi: 10.1002/clc.23543. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
8
Early Readmissions After Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死后的早期再入院情况
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Sep 1;120(5):723-728. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.05.049. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
9
Etiologies and predictors of 30-day readmissions in patients undergoing percutaneous mechanical circulatory support-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: Insights from the Nationwide Readmissions Database.美国接受经皮机械循环支持辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者30天再入院的病因及预测因素:来自全国再入院数据库的见解
Clin Cardiol. 2018 Apr;41(4):450-457. doi: 10.1002/clc.22893. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
10
Comparison of 30-Day Unplanned Readmissions to the Index Versus Nonindex Hospital After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后30天内计划外再入院至索引医院与非索引医院的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 May 1;125(9):1287-1294. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.01.051. Epub 2020 Feb 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Construction and validation of a readmission risk prediction model for elderly patients with coronary heart disease.老年冠心病患者再入院风险预测模型的构建与验证
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Dec 18;11:1497916. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1497916. eCollection 2024.
2
Early vs. Late Readmission following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Predictors and Impact on Long-Term Outcomes.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后早期与晚期再入院:预测因素及对长期结局的影响
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 20;12(4):1684. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041684.
3
Readmission and processes of care across weekend and weekday hospitalisation for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure or stroke: an observational study of the National Readmission Database.
急性心肌梗死、心力衰竭或中风患者周末和工作日住院的再入院和治疗过程:国家再入院数据库的观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 22;9(8):e029667. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029667.
4
Timing and Causes of Unplanned Readmissions After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the Nationwide Readmission Database.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后计划性再入院的时间和原因:来自全国再入院数据库的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 22;12(8):734-748. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Mar 27.