Suppr超能文献

自体分叉颈动脉重建术:技术与 2 年随访。

Autologous Bifurcated Carotid Artery Reconstruction: Technique and 2 Year Follow Up.

机构信息

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.

Research Office, Biostatistics, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Aug;56(2):163-170. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.03.019. Epub 2018 May 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Carotid bifurcation resection with subsequent reconstruction is performed infrequently. While internal carotid artery (ICA) revascularisation is regarded as mandatory, the external carotid artery (ECA) is severed in most instances. Indications for and results of an autologous bifurcated carotid artery reconstruction are discussed.

METHODS

This was a single centre retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of patients treated at an academic vascular surgery centre.

RESULTS

From December 2006 to August 2015, 47 patients underwent reconstruction of the carotid artery using an autologous bifurcated interposition graft (36 men; median age 68.3 years [range 41-87 years]; 33 asymptomatic [70%]). The indication for reconstruction was recurrent carotid stenosis unfavorable for endovascular treatment/redo patch plasty (n = 29; symptomatic: n = 12), carotid aneurysm (n = 10), neck tumour with vascular involvement (n = 7), and trauma (n = 1). Groups were not different with regard to vascular risk factors. Non-reversed valve depleted saphenous/accessory saphenous vein from the groin was used in 44 (94%), and reversed valve depleted cubital vein bifurcation graft in three patients (6%). Median ICA cross clamp time was 17 min (range 8-30 min). Five patients suffered from intra-operative ischaemic neurological deficits (11%), of which all were temporary except one. One tumour patient died on post-operative day 1 due to bleeding. Median follow up was 28.3 months (range 0.1-97.4 months). Tumour erosion required graft ligation in one patient 7 months after reconstruction. Five significant stenoses of the ICA (11%), nine (19%) stenoses of the ECA, and two (4%) common carotid artery stenoses, with four (8%) re-redo interventions, were observed. Thirteen patients (28%) died after a median follow up of 6.7 months (range 1.7-56.7 months), all unrelated to the vascular procedure.

CONCLUSION

Autologous bifurcated carotid artery interposition graft avoids the use of prosthetic graft material, the ECA remains patent in 80%, and it provides mid-term results comparable with other redo carotid artery procedures. Therefore, this procedure should be reserved for symptomatic patients with no other revascularisation option.

摘要

目的/背景:颈动脉分叉切除术随后进行重建的情况并不常见。虽然认为内颈动脉(ICA)再血管化是强制性的,但在大多数情况下会切断外颈动脉(ECA)。讨论自体分叉颈动脉重建的适应证和结果。

方法

这是对一家学术血管外科中心连续系列患者进行的单中心回顾性分析。

结果

2006 年 12 月至 2015 年 8 月,47 例患者使用自体分叉间置移植物重建颈动脉(36 例男性;中位年龄 68.3 岁[范围 41-87 岁];33 例无症状[70%])。重建的指征是不利于血管内治疗/重新修补补丁的复发性颈动脉狭窄/ redo 修补(n=29;有症状:n=12)、颈动脉瘤(n=10)、颈部肿瘤伴血管受累(n=7)和外伤(n=1)。两组在血管危险因素方面没有差异。44 例(94%)使用腹股沟非反向瓣膜耗竭隐静脉/辅助隐静脉,3 例(6%)使用反向瓣膜耗竭肘静脉分叉移植物。ICA 夹闭时间中位数为 17 分钟(范围 8-30 分钟)。5 例患者术中发生缺血性神经功能缺损(11%),其中除 1 例外均为暂时性。1 例肿瘤患者术后第 1 天死于出血。中位随访时间为 28.3 个月(范围 0.1-97.4 个月)。重建后 7 个月,1 例肿瘤患者因移植物结扎导致吻合口侵蚀。5 例 ICA 明显狭窄(11%),9 例 ECA 狭窄(19%),2 例颈总动脉狭窄(4%),4 例(8%)再次 redo 干预,13 例患者(28%)在中位随访 6.7 个月(范围 1.7-56.7 个月)后死亡,均与血管手术无关。

结论

自体分叉颈动脉间置移植物避免使用假体移植物材料,ECA 通畅率为 80%,中期结果与其他 redo 颈动脉手术相当。因此,该手术应保留给无其他血管重建选择的有症状患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验