Suppr超能文献

慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)初治超应答者基于干扰素的治疗的真实世界成本效果分析。

A real world cost effectiveness analysis of interferon-based therapy for HCV naïve super-responders.

机构信息

Hepatobiliary Division, Department of Internal Medicine and Hepatitis Center, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC.

Hepatobiliary Division, Department of Internal Medicine and Hepatitis Center, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC; Faculty of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC.

出版信息

J Chin Med Assoc. 2018 Aug;81(8):670-675. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2017.05.015. Epub 2018 Jun 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A direct-acting antiviral (DAA) era in hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment is fast approaching; unfortunately, the availability and affordability of DAAs in Asia-Pacific areas vary, making it difficult to develop universal HCV practice guidelines appropriate for the all Asian populations. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world cost-effectiveness of IFN-based therapy according to the current strategies with PegIFN/RBV for "easy-to-treat" to provide a reference for application of future DAA development for IFN-eligible, treatment naïve HCV patients.

METHODS

A total of 1032 chronic hepatitis C treatment-naïve patients who corresponded to response-guided therapy (RGT) guidelines of PegIFN/RBV regimens were linked to the entire population of expenditures and order in the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan. The average total cost per SVR achieved was calculated as the summation of the total cost for all treated patients/number of SVR cases.

RESULTS

Current RGT suggested 24 weeks of PegIFN/RBV for G1 naïve patients with baseline LVL and RVR at treatment week 4 achieved an average treatment cost per SVR of $5090 ± 2400. This was of superior cost-effectiveness compared with those other subgroups of G1 patients. In terms of G2 patients, according to current RGT of 16 weeks of treatment duration, PegIFN/RBV treatment with RVR achieved was of a very competitive cost per SVR ($3237 ± 488).

CONCLUSION

For a naïve patient in the new DAA era, the PegIFN/RBV treatment might be conserved for those with all favorable risk parameters, considering the treatment duration and cost per SVR, in the resource-constrained countries.

摘要

背景

丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)治疗的直接作用抗病毒(DAA)时代即将到来;然而,亚太地区 DAA 的可及性和可负担性各不相同,因此难以制定适用于所有亚洲人群的通用 HCV 实践指南。本研究旨在评估基于干扰素的治疗在当前 PegIFN/RBV 治疗策略下的真实世界成本效益,为未来适合 IFN 治疗的、初治 HCV 患者的 DAA 开发提供参考。

方法

共纳入 1032 例符合 PegIFN/RBV 方案应答指导治疗(RGT)指南的慢性丙型肝炎初治患者,这些患者与台湾全民健康保险研究数据库中的全部支出和医嘱相匹配。每例 SVR 获得的平均总成本是通过对所有治疗患者的总成本/ SVR 例数求和计算得出。

结果

目前的 RGT 建议 G1 初治患者在基线 LVL 和治疗第 4 周的 RVR 达标时使用 PegIFN/RBV 治疗 24 周,每例 SVR 的平均治疗成本为 5090 美元±2400 美元。这比其他 G1 患者亚组更具成本效益。对于 G2 患者,根据目前的 RGT(治疗时间为 16 周),获得 RVR 的 PegIFN/RBV 治疗每例 SVR 的成本非常具有竞争力(3237 美元±488 美元)。

结论

在新的 DAA 时代,对于初治患者,在资源有限的国家,考虑到治疗持续时间和每例 SVR 的成本,可以将 PegIFN/RBV 治疗保留给所有具有有利风险参数的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验