Suppr超能文献

社区使用的呼吸防护用品防止吸入火山灰的有效性。第二部分:总向内泄漏测试。

The effectiveness of respiratory protection worn by communities to protect from volcanic ash inhalation. Part II: Total inward leakage tests.

机构信息

Institute of Occupational Medicine, Centre for Human Exposure Science, Research Avenue North, Riccarton, Edinburgh, EH14 4AP, UK.

Institute of Hazard, Risk & Resilience, Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Science Labs., South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK.

出版信息

Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2018 Jul;221(6):977-984. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.03.011. Epub 2018 Mar 28.

Abstract

Inhalation of ash can be of great concern for affected communities, during and after volcanic eruptions. Governmental and humanitarian agencies recommend and distribute a variety of respiratory protection (RP), most commonly surgical masks. However, there is currently no evidence on how effective such masks are in protecting wearers from volcanic ash. In Part I of this study (Mueller et al., 2018), we assessed the filtration efficiency (FE) of 17 materials from different forms of RP against volcanic ash and a surrogate, low-toxicity dust, Aloxite. Based on those results, we now present the findings from a volunteer simulation study to test the effect of facial fit through assessment of Total Inward Leakage (TIL). Four different disposable RP types that demonstrated very high median FE (≥96% for Aloxite; ≥89% for volcanic ash) were tested without provision of training on fit. These were an industry-certified mask (N95-equiv.); a surgical mask from Japan designed to filter PM; a flat-fold basic mask from Indonesia; and a standard surgical mask from Mexico, which was also tested with an added medical bandage on top, as an additional intervention to improve fit. Ten volunteers (6 female, 4 male) were recruited. Each RP type was worn by volunteers under two different conditions simulating cleaning-up activities during/after volcanic ashfall. Each activity lasted 10 min and two repeats were completed for each RP type per activity. Dust (as PM) concentration inside and outside the mask was measured with two TSI SidePak aerosol monitors (Models AM510 and AM520, TSI, Minnesota, USA) to calculate TIL. A questionnaire was administered after each test to collect perceptions of fit, comfort, protection and breathability. The best-performing RP type, across both activities, was the industry-certified N95-equiv. mask with 9% mean TIL. The standard surgical mask and the basic flat-fold mask both performed worst (35% TIL). With the additional bandage intervention, the surgical mask mean TIL improved to 24%. The PM surgical mask performed similarly, with 22% TIL. The N95-equiv. mask was perceived to provide the best protection, but was also perceived as being uncomfortable and more difficult to breathe through. This study provides a first objective evidence base for the effectiveness of a selection of RP types typically worn around the world during volcanic crises. The findings will help agencies to make informed decisions on the procurement and distribution of RP in future eruptions.

摘要

吸入火山灰是受影响社区在火山爆发期间和之后特别关注的问题。政府和人道主义机构建议并分发各种呼吸保护(RP)设备,最常见的是外科口罩。然而,目前尚无证据表明此类口罩在保护佩戴者免受火山灰侵害方面的效果如何。在这项研究的第一部分(Mueller 等人,2018 年)中,我们评估了来自不同形式 RP 的 17 种材料对火山灰和替代的低毒性粉尘 Aloxite 的过滤效率(FE)。基于这些结果,我们现在提出了一项志愿者模拟研究的结果,通过评估总向内泄漏(TIL)来测试面部贴合度的效果。我们测试了四种不同的一次性 RP 类型,这些类型的中位 FE 非常高(Aloxite 为≥96%;火山灰为≥89%),并且在没有提供贴合度培训的情况下进行测试。这些是一种经过行业认证的口罩(N95 等效);一种日本设计的用于过滤 PM 的外科口罩;一种来自印度尼西亚的扁平折叠基本口罩;以及一种来自墨西哥的标准外科口罩,我们还在口罩顶部增加了一个医用绷带,作为改善贴合度的额外干预措施。招募了 10 名志愿者(6 名女性,4 名男性)。在模拟火山灰沉降期间/之后的清理活动的两种不同条件下,每位志愿者都佩戴了一种 RP 类型。每种活动持续 10 分钟,每种 RP 类型每种活动重复两次。使用两个 TSI SidePak 气溶胶监测器(型号 AM510 和 AM520,TSI,明尼苏达州,美国)在口罩内外测量粉尘(作为 PM)浓度,以计算 TIL。在每次测试后,都会进行问卷调查,以收集对贴合度、舒适度、保护和透气性的看法。在这两种活动中,性能最佳的 RP 类型是经过行业认证的 N95 等效口罩,平均 TIL 为 9%。标准外科口罩和基本的扁平折叠口罩的性能最差(TIL 为 35%)。使用额外的绷带干预措施后,外科口罩的平均 TIL 改善至 24%。PM 外科口罩的 TIL 也类似,为 22%。N95 等效口罩被认为提供了最佳保护,但也被认为不舒服,并且更难呼吸。这项研究为通常在全球范围内用于火山危机期间的各种 RP 类型的有效性提供了第一个客观的证据基础。这些发现将有助于机构在未来的喷发中就 RP 的采购和分配做出明智的决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验