Hernández Maciel M, Eisenberg Nancy, Valiente Carlos, Thompson Marilyn S, Spinrad Tracy L, Grimm Kevin J, VanSchyndel Sarah K, Berger Rebecca H, Silva Kassondra M, Pina Armando A, Southworth Jody, Gal Diana E
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University.
T. Denny Sanford School of Social and Family Dynamics, Arizona State University.
J Educ Psychol. 2018 Apr;110(3):324-337. doi: 10.1037/edu0000213. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
We examined individual trajectories, across four time points, of children's ( = 301) expression of negative emotion in classroom settings and whether these trajectories predicted their observed school engagement, teacher-reported academic skills, and passage comprehension assessed with a standardized measure in first grade. In latent growth curve analyses, negative expressivity declined from kindergarten to first grade with significant individual differences in trajectories. Negative expressivity in kindergarten inversely predicted first grade school engagement and teacher-reported academic skills, and the slope of negative expressivity from kindergarten to first grade inversely predicted school engagement (e.g., increasing negative expressivity was associated with lower school engagement). In addition, we examined if prior academic functioning in kindergarten moderated the association between negative expressivity (level in kindergarten and change over time) and academic functioning in first grade. The slope of negative expressivity was negatively associated with first grade school engagement and passage comprehension for children who had lower kindergarten school engagement and passage comprehension, respectively, but was unrelated for those with higher academic functioning in kindergarten. That is, for children who had lower kindergarten school engagement and passage comprehension, greater declines in negative expressivity were associated with higher first grade school engagement and passage comprehension, respectively. The findings suggest that negative emotional expressivity in school is associated with academic outcomes in first grade and, in some cases, this association is more pronounced for children who had lower kindergarten academic functioning.
我们考察了301名儿童在课堂环境中四个时间点的负面情绪表达的个体轨迹,以及这些轨迹是否能预测他们在一年级时观察到的学校参与度、教师报告的学业技能以及通过标准化测量评估的阅读理解能力。在潜在增长曲线分析中,负面情绪表达从幼儿园到一年级呈下降趋势,轨迹存在显著的个体差异。幼儿园时期的负面情绪表达与一年级的学校参与度和教师报告的学业技能呈负相关,从幼儿园到一年级负面情绪表达的斜率与学校参与度呈负相关(例如,负面情绪表达增加与学校参与度降低相关)。此外,我们还考察了幼儿园时期先前的学业表现是否调节了负面情绪表达(幼儿园时期的水平和随时间的变化)与一年级学业表现之间的关联。负面情绪表达的斜率分别与幼儿园学校参与度和阅读理解能力较低的儿童在一年级时的学校参与度和阅读理解能力呈负相关,但与幼儿园学业表现较高的儿童无关。也就是说,对于幼儿园学校参与度和阅读理解能力较低的儿童,负面情绪表达的更大下降分别与一年级更高的学校参与度和阅读理解能力相关。研究结果表明,学校中的负面情绪表达与一年级的学业成绩相关,在某些情况下,这种关联在幼儿园学业表现较低的儿童中更为明显。