Kruse Gina R, Rigotti Nancy A, Raw Martin, McNeill Ann, Murray Rachael, Piné-Abata Hembadoon, Bitton Asaf, McEwen Andy
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Smok Cessat. 2017 Dec;12(4):213-220. doi: 10.1017/jsc.2016.22. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
There are limited existing data describing the training methods used to educate tobacco cessation treatment providers around the world.
To measure the prevalence of tobacco cessation treatment content, skills training and teaching methods reported by tobacco treatment training programs across the world.
Web-based survey in May-September 2013 among tobacco cessation training experts across six geographic regions and four World Bank income levels. Response rate was 73% (84 of 115 countries contacted).
Of 104 individual programs from 84 countries, most reported teaching brief advice (78%) and one-to-one counseling (74%); telephone counseling was uncommon (33%). Overall, teaching of knowledge topics was more commonly reported than skills training. Programs in lower income countries less often reported teaching about medications, behavioral treatments and biomarkers and less often reported skills-based training about interviewing clients, medication management, biomarker measurement, assessing client outcomes, and assisting clients with co-morbidities. Programs reported a median 15 hours of training. Face-to-face training was common (85%); online programs were rare (19%). Almost half (47%) included no learner assessment. Only 35% offered continuing education.
Nearly all programs reported teaching evidence-based treatment modalities in a face-to-face format. Few programs delivered training online or offered continuing education. Skills-based training was less common among low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). There is a large unmet need for tobacco treatment training protocols which emphasize practical skills, and which are more rapidly scalable than face-to-face training in LMICs.
目前关于全球用于培训戒烟治疗提供者的方法的数据有限。
衡量全球戒烟治疗培训项目所报告的戒烟治疗内容、技能培训和教学方法的普及程度。
2013年5月至9月对六个地理区域和四个世界银行收入水平的戒烟培训专家进行基于网络的调查。回复率为73%(联系的115个国家中有84个回复)。
来自84个国家的104个独立项目中,大多数报告了简短建议教学(78%)和一对一咨询(74%);电话咨询不常见(33%)。总体而言,知识主题教学的报告比技能培训更为普遍。低收入国家的项目较少报告药物治疗、行为治疗和生物标志物方面的教学,也较少报告关于访谈客户、药物管理、生物标志物测量、评估客户结果以及协助患有合并症客户的技能培训。项目报告的培训时长中位数为15小时。面对面培训很常见(85%);在线项目很少见(19%)。几乎一半(47%)的项目没有学习者评估。只有35%提供继续教育。
几乎所有项目都报告以面对面形式教授循证治疗模式。很少有项目提供在线培训或继续教育。基于技能的培训在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)不太常见。对于强调实践技能且比LMICs中的面对面培训更易于快速推广的戒烟治疗培训方案,存在大量未满足的需求。