Suppr超能文献

尽管对其益处知之甚少,4 因子凝血酶原复合物浓缩物的超适应证使用仍很常见:一项回顾性研究。

Off-label use of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate is common despite little known benefit: A retrospective study.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Haematol. 2018 Sep;101(3):349-353. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13105. Epub 2018 Jul 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: While four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) is FDA-approved for reversal of warfarin-induced major bleeding, its use in real-world settings is unclear. This study's objective was to identify indications leading to 4F-PCC use and associated outcomes at a single university hospital.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients receiving 4F-PCC over a 22-month period. A dose was "on-label" if given for reversal of warfarin-induced coagulopathy in patients with major bleeding or requiring urgent surgeries/procedures; other doses were "off-label".

RESULTS

A total of 165 doses of 4F-PCC in 154 patients were given. Sixty-one percent of doses were on-label, while 39% were off-label. Intracranial hemorrhage was the most common indication (55% of doses). On-label patients had significantly higher rate of INR normalization and survival to hospital discharge than off-label patients. There was no difference in time to INR normalization, time to hemostasis, or incidence of thromboembolic complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Off-label use of 4F-PCC is likely common, occurring in nearly 40% of drug administrations at our center. Larger-scale prospective trials studying specific indications are needed for validation in off-label settings. Until such evidence is available, given potential harms historically displayed by off-label use of other hemostatic agents, limiting off-label 4F-PCC use is recommended.

摘要

背景/目的:虽然四因子凝血酶原复合物浓缩物(4F-PCC)已获得美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准用于逆转华法林引起的大出血,但在实际应用中其使用情况尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定在一家大学附属医院使用 4F-PCC 的指征及其相关结局。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了在 22 个月期间接受 4F-PCC 治疗的患者。如果给予华法林诱导的凝血功能障碍患者(有大出血或需要紧急手术/操作)或因其他原因接受大剂量的 4F-PCC 治疗则为“适应证内”;如果给予其他剂量则为“适应证外”。

结果

共给予 154 例患者 165 剂 4F-PCC。61%的剂量为适应证内,39%为适应证外。颅内出血是最常见的适应证(占剂量的 55%)。与适应证外患者相比,适应证内患者的 INR 正常化率和住院存活率更高。两组患者在 INR 正常化时间、止血时间或血栓栓塞并发症发生率方面无差异。

结论

在我们中心,4F-PCC 的适应证外使用可能很常见,近 40%的药物给药属于这种情况。需要进行更大规模的前瞻性试验,以研究特定的适应证,从而在适应证外情况下对其进行验证。在获得此类证据之前,鉴于其他止血药物的适应证外使用历史上显示出的潜在危害,建议限制 4F-PCC 的适应证外使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验