Woldman Anat, Kaneti Nurit, Carmeli Eli
1 Maccabi HMO Israel , Givatayim, Israel .
2 Physical Therapy Department, University of Haifa , Haifa, Israel .
Lymphat Res Biol. 2018 Oct;16(5):453-457. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2017.0066. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
Compression therapy is the only conservative treatment that has been shown to be effective for patients with lymphedema in randomized controlled trials. A commonly used classification system divides pressure into four categories ranging from mild to very strong. For lower limb edema, bandages with strong pressure were shown to be most effective. Recent studies indicate that many health care professionals use inadequate pressure. No study thus far has focused on therapists who are trained in lymphatic treatment.
Thirty-seven physiotherapists trained in lymphatic treatment were recruited. Each participant received a questionnaire concerning their competence in compression bandaging. The subjects were asked to apply bandages using strong and medium pressure in two practical trials. Using a PicoPress device, pressure was measured both directly after bandaging and 2 hours later; 75.68% of participants successfully applied the bandaging with moderate pressure, correctly at least once, and 62.16% managed to do so with high pressure. A trend in the results shows that the higher the sub-bandage pressure at the beginning, the more it dropped after 2 hours. There was high consistency in pressure application for strong and moderate pressure. No correlation was found between the parameters of the questionnaire and correct bandaging pressure.
Most of the physiotherapists were successful, at least once, in applying bandages with the proper amount of pressure. It is possible that the nature of the lymphatic treatment contributes to their success. Participants were most accurate in applying moderate pressure; however, it is unclear what impact this pressure has on a leg with lymphedema.
在随机对照试验中,压迫疗法是唯一被证明对淋巴水肿患者有效的保守治疗方法。一种常用的分类系统将压力分为从轻度到极强的四类。对于下肢水肿,高压绷带被证明是最有效的。最近的研究表明,许多医护人员使用的压力不足。迄今为止,尚无研究关注接受过淋巴治疗培训的治疗师。
招募了37名接受过淋巴治疗培训的物理治疗师。每位参与者都收到一份关于他们在加压包扎方面能力的问卷。在两项实际试验中,要求受试者分别使用高压和中压进行绷带包扎。使用PicoPress设备,在包扎后立即以及2小时后测量压力;75.68%的参与者至少有一次成功正确地使用了中压绷带包扎,62.16%的参与者成功正确地使用了高压绷带包扎。结果趋势表明,开始时绷带下的压力越高,2小时后下降得越多。在高压和中压绷带包扎的压力施加方面具有高度一致性。未发现问卷参数与正确包扎压力之间存在相关性。
大多数物理治疗师至少有一次成功地以适当的压力进行了绷带包扎。淋巴治疗的性质可能促成了他们的成功。参与者在施加中压时最为准确;然而,尚不清楚这种压力对患有淋巴水肿的腿部有何影响。