Suppr超能文献

辅助性抗菌光动力疗法治疗牙周病深牙周袋的效果如何?一项系统评价。

How effective is adjunctive antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in treating deep periodontal pockets in periodontal disease? A systematic review.

作者信息

Akram Zohaib

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ziauddin University, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

J Investig Clin Dent. 2018 Nov;9(4):e12345. doi: 10.1111/jicd.12345. Epub 2018 Jun 4.

Abstract

The aim of the present systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) that is used as an adjunctive therapy with scaling and root planing (SRP) in deep periodontal pockets (≥5 mm). The addressed Patients, Intervention, Comparators, Outcomes, and Study design question was: In patients with advanced periodontitis (population), what is the effect of aPDT as adjunct to SRP (intervention) in comparison to SRP alone (comparison) on deep probing depths (outcome)? Electronic and manual literature searches were conducted using the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, up to and including February 2018. Six randomized trials were included. All studies used the combined approach aPDT+SRP and SRP in the test and control groups, respectively. The follow-up period ranged from 12 to 48 weeks. Wavelengths, power density, and duration of irradiation used were 670 nm, 500 mW cm , and 60 seconds, respectively. All studies showed significant reduction of probing depth (PD) ≥5 mm with aPDT at follow up. Considering the effects of adjunctive aPDT compared to SRP, only two studies showed additional benefit of adjunctive aPDT in reducing PD ≥5 mm compared to SRP alone at follow up. The overall mean difference for PD reduction (weighted mean difference = 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.03 to -0.66, P = .08) was also not significant between the aPDT and SRP groups at follow up. Whether aPDT as an adjunct to SRP is efficacious in the reduction of PD ≥5 mm compared to SRP alone in periodontal disease remains debatable, given that the available scientific evidence is weak.

摘要

本系统评价的目的是评估在深度牙周袋(≥5毫米)中,作为龈下刮治和根面平整(SRP)辅助治疗的抗菌光动力疗法(aPDT)的疗效。所提出的患者、干预措施、对照、结局和研究设计问题是:在晚期牙周炎患者(人群)中,与单独的SRP(对照)相比,aPDT作为SRP的辅助治疗(干预措施)对深牙周袋深度(结局)有何影响?使用以下数据库进行了电子和手工文献检索:MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库和Cochrane口腔健康组试验注册库,检索截至2018年2月。纳入了六项随机试验。所有研究在试验组和对照组中分别使用了aPDT+SRP联合方法和SRP。随访期为12至48周。所使用的波长、功率密度和照射持续时间分别为670纳米、500毫瓦/平方厘米和60秒。所有研究均显示,随访时aPDT可使≥5毫米的牙周袋深度(PD)显著降低。考虑到辅助aPDT与SRP相比的效果,只有两项研究显示,与单独的SRP相比,辅助aPDT在随访时对降低≥5毫米的PD有额外益处。随访时,aPDT组和SRP组之间PD降低的总体平均差异(加权平均差异=0.31,95%置信区间[CI]=-0.03至-0.66,P=0.08)也不显著。鉴于现有科学证据不足,aPDT作为SRP的辅助治疗在牙周疾病中与单独的SRP相比,是否能有效降低≥5毫米的PD仍存在争议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验