Suppr超能文献

以家庭为基础治疗青少年神经性厌食症中的治疗作用机制定位:临床医生/研究人员观点的初步研究。

Locating the mechanisms of therapeutic agency in family-based treatment for adolescent anorexia nervosa: A pilot study of clinician/researcher perspectives.

机构信息

a Department of Psychiatry , University of California , San Francisco , CA , USA.

b Department of Psychology , University of Hawai'i at Mānoa , Honolulu , HI , USA.

出版信息

Eat Disord. 2018 Sep-Oct;26(5):477-486. doi: 10.1080/10640266.2018.1481306. Epub 2018 Jun 4.

Abstract

The theoretical agnosticism of family-based treatment (FBT) has precluded a thorough understanding of treatment mechanisms. We examined clinician and researcher perspectives on the mechanisms of FBT. Thirty-eight clinicians/researchers who had recently published in the domain of anorexia nervosa (AN) indicated their opinions as to the mechanisms of FBT, and content analysis was performed to identify relevant themes. Parental input was deemed crucial for weight-based symptom remission, and weight restoration was deemed crucial for cognitive symptom relief. Participants reported that mechanisms of FBT may be nullified by psychiatric comorbidities (50%), inappropriate weight goals (37%), or a long illness duration (24%). Attributions of causality to parents (66%) or family system factors (37%) were noted in instances of nonsuccessful outcomes. These findings offer important insights into clinician/researcher perspectives on the mechanisms of FBT and highlight beliefs among clinicians and researchers that may not reflect emerging evidence, or the theoretical framework of FBT.

摘要

基于家庭的治疗(FBT)的理论不可知论阻碍了对治疗机制的全面理解。我们研究了临床医生和研究人员对 FBT 机制的看法。38 名最近在厌食症(AN)领域发表过文章的临床医生/研究人员表示了他们对 FBT 机制的看法,然后进行内容分析以确定相关主题。父母的投入被认为对基于体重的症状缓解至关重要,而体重恢复被认为对认知症状缓解至关重要。参与者报告说,FBT 的机制可能会被精神共病(50%)、不适当的体重目标(37%)或疾病持续时间长(24%)所抵消。在不成功的情况下,会将因果关系归因于父母(66%)或家庭系统因素(37%)。这些发现为临床医生/研究人员对 FBT 机制的看法提供了重要的见解,并强调了临床医生和研究人员的信念,这些信念可能与新出现的证据或 FBT 的理论框架不符。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验