University of Melbourne, Australia; University of California, San Francisco; and The University of Chicago, IL (emeritus).
University of Melbourne and Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Australia.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;55(8):683-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.05.007. Epub 2016 May 25.
There have been few randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for adolescents with anorexia nervosa (AN). Most of these posit that involving all family members in treatment supports favorable outcomes. However, at least 2 RCTs suggest that separate parent and adolescent sessions may be just as effective as conjoint treatment. This study compared the relative efficacy of family-based treatment (FBT) and parent-focused treatment (PFT). In PFT, the therapist meets with the parents only, while a nurse monitors the patient.
Participants (N = 107) aged 12 to 18 years and meeting DSM 4(th)Edition criteria for AN or partial AN were randomized to either FBT or PFT. Participants were assessed at baseline, end of treatment (EOT), and at 6 and 12 months posttreatment. Treatments comprised 18 outpatient sessions over 6 months. The primary outcome was remission, defined as ≥95% of median body mass index and Eating Disorder Examination Global Score within 1 SD of community norms.
Remission was higher in PFT than in FBT at EOT (43% versus 22%; p = .016, odds ratio [OR] = 3.03, 95% CI = 1.23-7.46), but did not differ statistically at 6-month (PFT 39% versus FBT 22%; p = .053, OR = 2.48, CI = 0.989-6.22), or 12-month (PFT 37% versus FBT 29%; p = .444, OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 0.60-3.21) follow-up. Several treatment effect moderators of primary outcome were identified.
At EOT, PFT was more efficacious than FBT in bringing about remission in adolescents with AN. However, differences in remission rates between PFT and FBT at follow-up were not statistically significant.
A Randomised Controlled Trial of Two Forms of Family-Based Treatment and the Effect on Percent Ideal Body Weight and Eating Disorders Symptoms in Adolescent Anorexia Nervosa; http://www.anzctr.org.au/; ACTRN12610000216011.
针对厌食症青少年的随机临床试验(RCT)较少。这些试验大多认为让所有家庭成员参与治疗有助于获得良好的结果。然而,至少有两项 RCT 表明,分别对父母和青少年进行治疗可能与联合治疗同样有效。本研究比较了基于家庭的治疗(FBT)和以父母为中心的治疗(PFT)的相对疗效。在 PFT 中,治疗师仅与父母会面,而护士则监测患者。
将年龄在 12 至 18 岁之间且符合 DSM 4(th)版厌食症或部分厌食症标准的 107 名参与者随机分配至 FBT 或 PFT 组。参与者在基线、治疗结束时(EOT)以及治疗后 6 个月和 12 个月时进行评估。治疗包括 6 个月内 18 次门诊治疗。主要结局是缓解,定义为体重指数中位数的≥95%和饮食失调检查全球评分在社区正常范围内的 1 个标准差内。
在 EOT 时,PFT 的缓解率高于 FBT(43%对 22%;p=0.016,优势比[OR]为 3.03,95%CI 为 1.23-7.46),但在 6 个月(PFT 39%对 FBT 22%;p=0.053,OR 为 2.48,CI 为 0.989-6.22)和 12 个月(PFT 37%对 FBT 29%;p=0.444,OR 为 1.39,95%CI 为 0.60-3.21)随访时,统计学上无差异。确定了主要结局的几个治疗效果调节剂。
在 EOT 时,PFT 比 FBT 更能有效促使 AN 青少年缓解。然而,在随访期间,PFT 和 FBT 的缓解率差异无统计学意义。
两种形式的家庭为基础的治疗方法对青少年厌食症的理想体重百分比和饮食失调症状的影响的随机对照试验;http://www.anzctr.org.au/;ACTRN12610000216011。