Center for Simulation, Advanced Education and Innovation, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stony Brook Children's Hospital, Stony Brook, NY.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 Jun;19(6):528-537. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001531.
Cricoid pressure is often used to prevent regurgitation during induction and mask ventilation prior to high-risk tracheal intubation in critically ill children. Clinical data in children showing benefit are limited. Our objective was to evaluate the association between cricoid pressure use and the occurrence of regurgitation during tracheal intubation for critically ill children in PICU.
A retrospective cohort study of a multicenter pediatric airway quality improvement registry.
Thirty-five PICUs within general and children's hospitals (29 in the United States, three in Canada, one in Japan, one in Singapore, and one in New Zealand).
Children (< 18 yr) with initial tracheal intubation using direct laryngoscopy in PICUs between July 2010 and December 2015.
None.
Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between cricoid pressure use and the occurrence of regurgitation while adjusting for underlying differences in patient and clinical care factors. Of 7,825 events, cricoid pressure was used in 1,819 (23%). Regurgitation was reported in 106 of 7,825 (1.4%) and clinical aspiration in 51 of 7,825 (0.7%). Regurgitation was reported in 35 of 1,819 (1.9%) with cricoid pressure, and 71 of 6,006 (1.2%) without cricoid pressure (unadjusted odds ratio, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.09-2.47; p = 0.018). On multivariable analysis, cricoid pressure was not associated with the occurrence of regurgitation after adjusting for patient, practice, and known regurgitation risk factors (adjusted odds ratio, 1.57; 95% CI, 0.99-2.47; p = 0.054). A sensitivity analysis in propensity score-matched cohorts showed cricoid pressure was associated with a higher regurgitation rate (adjusted odds ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02; p = 0.036).
Cricoid pressure during induction and mask ventilation before tracheal intubation in the current ICU practice was not associated with a lower regurgitation rate after adjusting for previously reported confounders. Further studies are needed to determine whether cricoid pressure for specific indication with proper maneuver would be effective in reducing regurgitation events.
在有高危风险的小儿重症监护病房(PICU)患儿进行诱导和面罩通气期间,环状软骨施压常被用于防止反流。但目前关于小儿患者的临床获益数据仍很有限。我们的目的在于评估 PICU 中使用环状软骨施压与气管插管期间反流发生之间的关联。
一项多中心儿科气道质量改进登记处的回顾性队列研究。
35 个儿科重症监护病房(美国 29 个,加拿大 3 个,日本 1 个,新加坡 1 个,新西兰 1 个)。
2010 年 7 月至 2015 年 12 月期间在 PICU 中使用直接喉镜进行初始气管插管的<18 岁患儿。
无。
多变量逻辑回归分析用于评估在调整患者和临床护理因素方面的差异后,环状软骨施压使用与反流发生之间的关联。在 7825 个事件中,1819 个(23%)使用了环状软骨施压。在 7825 个中报告了 106 个(1.4%)反流和 51 个(0.7%)临床误吸。在使用环状软骨施压的 1819 个中报告了 35 个(1.9%)反流,而在 6006 个中未使用环状软骨施压的有 71 个(1.2%)(未调整的优势比,1.64;95%置信区间,1.09-2.47;p=0.018)。在多变量分析中,在调整了患者、实践和已知反流风险因素后,环状软骨施压与反流的发生无关(调整后的优势比,1.57;95%置信区间,0.99-2.47;p=0.054)。在倾向评分匹配队列的敏感性分析中,环状软骨施压与更高的反流发生率相关(调整后的优势比,1.01;95%置信区间,1.00-1.02;p=0.036)。
在当前的 ICU 实践中,在诱导和面罩通气期间进行环状软骨施压,与调整后之前报道的混杂因素无关,并未降低气管插管后的反流率。还需要进一步的研究来确定是否在特定适应证下使用环状软骨施压并进行正确的操作会有效减少反流事件。