Kusuma School of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, India; Institute of Microbiology and Infection, School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, UK.
Institute of Microbiology and Infection, School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, UK.
Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom. 2018 Sep;1866(9):941-951. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2018.05.015. Epub 2018 Jun 2.
The isolated apical domain of GroEL consisting of residues 191-345 (known as "minichaperone") binds and assists the folding of a wide variety of client proteins without GroES and ATP, but the mechanism of its action is still unknown. In order to probe into the matter, we have examined minichaperone-mediated folding of a large aggregation prone protein Maltodextrin-glucosidase (MalZ). The key objective was to identify whether MalZ exists free in solution, or remains bound to, or cycling on and off the minichaperone during the refolding process. When GroES was introduced during refolding process, production of the native MalZ was inhibited. We also observed the same findings with a trap mutant of GroEL, which stably captures a predominantly non-native MalZ released from minichaperone during refolding process, but does not release it. Tryptophan and ANS fluorescence measurements indicated that refolded MalZ has the same structure as the native MalZ, but that its structure when bound to minichaperone is different. Surface plasmon resonance measurements provide an estimate for the equilibrium dissociation constant KD for the MalZ-minichaperone complex of 0.21 ± 0.04 μM, which are significantly higher than for most GroEL clients. This showed that minichaperone interacts loosely with MalZ to allow the protein to change its conformation and fold while bound during the refolding process. These observations suggest that the minichaperone works by carrying out repeated cycles of binding aggregation-prone protein MalZ in a relatively compact conformation and in a partially folded but active state, and releasing them to attempt to fold in solution.
GroEL 的分离的顶端结构域由残基 191-345 组成(称为“小伴侣蛋白”),在没有 GroES 和 ATP 的情况下结合并协助多种客户蛋白的折叠,但其作用机制尚不清楚。为了探究这一问题,我们研究了小伴侣蛋白介导的大聚集倾向蛋白麦芽糖葡糖苷酶(MalZ)的折叠。主要目的是确定 MalZ 是否在溶液中自由存在,或者在折叠过程中是否仍然与小伴侣蛋白结合、循环结合和解离。当在折叠过程中引入 GroES 时,会抑制天然 MalZ 的产生。我们还观察到 GroEL 的陷阱突变体也有同样的发现,该突变体能稳定捕获从小伴侣蛋白中释放的主要非天然 MalZ,但不能释放它。色氨酸和 ANS 荧光测量表明,折叠后的 MalZ 具有与天然 MalZ 相同的结构,但与小伴侣蛋白结合时的结构不同。表面等离子体共振测量提供了 MalZ-小伴侣蛋白复合物的平衡解离常数 KD 的估计值为 0.21±0.04μM,这明显高于大多数 GroEL 客户。这表明小伴侣蛋白与 MalZ 松散相互作用,允许蛋白质在折叠过程中结合时改变其构象和折叠。这些观察结果表明,小伴侣蛋白通过反复循环结合相对紧凑构象的聚集倾向蛋白 MalZ 并在部分折叠但活跃的状态下释放它们来尝试在溶液中折叠。