Di Tondo Serena, Ferretti Fabio, Bielli Silvia
Tuscany Rehabilitation Clinic, 52025 Montevarchi (AR), Italy. Tel +39 339 118 5384.
J Allied Health. 2018 Summer;47(2):133-140.
Defining professional competence and identifying the best way to evaluate these skills has become a topic of study for physiotherapists. The aims of this study were: (1) to reveal and compare the level of competence declared by physiotherapy students with that of professional physiotherapists in the investigated competencies, and (2) to show any associations between the level of competences of physiotherapists and their age or education level.
A descriptive cross-sectional survey.
A sample of 273 physiotherapists and 84 physiotherapy students executed self-assessment of their competences using a Likert scale.
Students declared a lower level of self-assessed competence (mean 2.76) than physiotherapists (mean 3.20), but some items regarding the ICF model and evidence-based practice (EBP) had higher scores for students than professionals. In the field of EBP, both groups showed insufficient scores for all items. For the investigated skills, we observed an association between the level of declared competence and age and education level (p<0.05).
Survey results could be used by academies, professional associations, and employers to identify specific learning goals of students and physiotherapists.
界定专业能力并确定评估这些技能的最佳方法已成为物理治疗师的一个研究课题。本研究的目的是:(1)揭示并比较物理治疗专业学生所宣称的能力水平与专业物理治疗师在所调查能力方面的水平,以及(2)展示物理治疗师的能力水平与其年龄或教育水平之间的任何关联。
描述性横断面调查。
273名物理治疗师和84名物理治疗专业学生的样本使用李克特量表对他们的能力进行自我评估。
学生宣称的自我评估能力水平(平均2.76)低于物理治疗师(平均3.20),但关于国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)模型及循证实践(EBP)的一些项目,学生的得分高于专业人员。在循证实践领域,两组在所有项目上的得分都不足。对于所调查的技能,我们观察到宣称的能力水平与年龄和教育水平之间存在关联(p<0.05)。
学院、专业协会和雇主可利用调查结果确定学生和物理治疗师的具体学习目标。