Suppr超能文献

探头与显微镜:不同图像到患者配准方法的比较。

Probe versus microscope: a comparison of different methods for image-to-patient registration.

机构信息

ENT/4D-Visualization, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, Innsbruck, Austria.

ENT, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018 Oct;13(10):1539-1548. doi: 10.1007/s11548-018-1800-0. Epub 2018 Jun 5.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Computer-aided navigation is widely used in ENT surgery. The position of a surgical instrument is shown in the CT/MR images of the patient and can thus be a good support for the surgeon. The accuracy is highly dependent on the registration done prior to surgery. A microscope and a probe can both be used for registration and navigation, depending on the surgical intervention. A navigation system typically only reports the fiducial registration error after paired-point registration. However, the target registration error (TRE)-a measurement for the accuracy in the surgical area-is much more relevant. The aim of this work was to compare the performance of a microscope relative to a conventional probe-based approach with different registration methods.

METHODS

In this study, optical tracking was used to register a plastic skull to its preoperative CT images with paired-point registration. Anatomical landmarks and skin-affixed markers were used as fiducials and targets. With both microscope and probe, four different registration methods were evaluated based on their TREs at 10 targets. For half of the experiments, a surface registration and/or external fiducials were used additionally to paired-point registration to study their influence to accuracy.

RESULTS

Overall, probe registration leads to a smaller TRE ([Formula: see text]) than registration with a microscope ([Formula: see text]). Additional surface registration does not result in better accuracy of navigation for microscope and probe. The lowest mean TRE for both pointers can be achieved with paired-point registration only and radiolucent markers.

CONCLUSION

Our experiments showed that a probe used for registration and navigation achieves lower TREs compared using a microscope. Neither additional surface registration nor additional fiducials on an external reference element are necessary for improved accuracy of navigated ENT surgery on a plastic skull.

摘要

目的

计算机辅助导航在耳鼻喉科手术中得到了广泛应用。手术器械的位置显示在患者的 CT/MR 图像中,可以为外科医生提供良好的支持。准确性高度依赖于手术前的注册。显微镜和探头都可以用于注册和导航,具体取决于手术干预的方式。导航系统通常仅在配对点注册后报告基准注册误差。然而,目标注册误差(TRE)——用于测量手术区域准确性的指标——更为相关。本研究的目的是比较显微镜相对于传统基于探头的方法,以及不同注册方法的性能。

方法

在这项研究中,光学跟踪用于通过配对点注册将塑料颅骨与其术前 CT 图像进行配准。解剖标志和皮肤固定标记用作基准和目标。使用显微镜和探头,根据 10 个目标的 TRE,评估了四种不同的注册方法。对于一半的实验,还使用了表面注册和/或外部基准点,以研究其对准确性的影响。

结果

总体而言,探头注册的 TRE 比显微镜注册小([公式:见文本])。额外的表面注册并不会提高显微镜和探头导航的准确性。两种指针都可以通过仅使用配对点注册和不透射线标记来实现最低的平均 TRE。

结论

我们的实验表明,与显微镜相比,用于注册和导航的探头可以实现更低的 TRE。对于在塑料颅骨上进行导航的耳鼻喉科手术,额外的表面注册或外部基准点上的额外基准点都不是提高准确性所必需的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fd3/6153656/8b99c14cf939/11548_2018_1800_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验