Abteilung für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Oct;34(10):1657-1667. doi: 10.1007/s10554-018-1377-2. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
To compare a semi-automatic software tool for the measurement of aortic annulus dimensions with manual measurements by expert readers and to analyze whether and to what extent interchangeability exists between semi-automatic and manual measurements. We retrospectively included 374 consecutive patients with high-grade aortic stenosis who had undergone CT-angiography of the heart prior to trans-catheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). In independent analyses, two expert readers manually measured aortic annulus dimensions (long axis, short axis, circumference, area) as well as the distance of the coronary ostia from the annulus plane. A third independent reader performed annulus evaluation using a software tool for semi-automatic detection and measurement of the annulus plane. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis was used to compare both manual measurements as well as manual and semi-automatic measurements of annulus parameters. Using the respective measurements we simulated size selection for a Sapien XT transcatheter heart valve (THV). Interchangeability of methods was addressed by calculation of the estimated individual equivalence index γ. There was excellent agreement between both expert observers in manual measurements of the annulus with ICC's in the range 0.89-0.94 for all anatomic parameters. Similar high agreements were observed between semi-automatic and manual measurements, with ICC's in the range of 0.89-0.95. THV size recommendation based on manual versus semiautomatic measurements agreed in 80.7% of cases while agreement between both expert readers concerning THV size recommendation was 80.6%. Semi-automatic measurements of anatomic parameters of the aortic root show high agreement and interchangeability with manual measurements in CT-angiography prior to TAVR.
比较一种半自动软件工具测量主动脉瓣环尺寸与专家读者的手动测量,并分析半自动和手动测量之间是否存在以及存在何种程度的可互换性。我们回顾性地纳入了 374 例接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)前心脏 CT 血管造影的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者。在独立分析中,两位专家读者手动测量了主动脉瓣环尺寸(长轴、短轴、周长、面积)以及冠状动脉开口距瓣环平面的距离。第三位独立读者使用半自动检测和测量瓣环平面的软件工具进行瓣环评估。使用组内相关系数(ICC)和 Bland-Altman 分析比较两种手动测量以及手动和半自动测量瓣环参数。使用各自的测量结果,我们模拟了 Sapien XT 经导管心脏瓣膜(THV)的尺寸选择。通过计算估计的个体等效指数γ来解决方法的可互换性。两位专家观察者在手动测量瓣环时具有极好的一致性,所有解剖参数的 ICC 值在 0.89-0.94 之间。半自动和手动测量之间也观察到了类似的高度一致性,ICC 值在 0.89-0.95 之间。基于手动与半自动测量的 THV 尺寸推荐在 80.7%的病例中一致,而两位专家观察者在 THV 尺寸推荐方面的一致性为 80.6%。TAVR 前 CT 血管造影中,主动脉根部解剖参数的半自动测量与手动测量具有高度一致性和可互换性。