Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018 Nov;70(11):1702-1709. doi: 10.1002/art.40583.
Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a public safety alert, responding to the results of the now-published Cardiovascular Safety of Febuxostat and Allopurinol in Patients With Gout and Cardiovascular Morbidities (CARES) trial. The CARES trial showed no significant difference between allopurinol and febuxostat in the primary composite end point of cardiovascular (CV) events in subjects with gout and established CV comorbidities at baseline. However, there was a significantly increased risk of CV and all-cause mortality with febuxostat. Urate-lowering therapy (ULT) is central to the long-term management of gout, and xanthine oxidoreductase inhibitor (XOI) therapy is the consensus first-line approach. Allopurinol is generally the first XOI used, but febuxostat is an effective XOI option, and is commonly used when allopurinol is not tolerated. These data are further relevant since CV comorbidities are common in gout. Here, we examine why the CARES trial was done, and discuss other, ongoing comparative studies of febuxostat and allopurinol whose results are awaited. We assess the strengths and limitations of the CARES trial, and appraise the robustness and biologic plausibility of the results. The CARES trial does not prove that febuxostat raises CV mortality risk, but suggests greater risk with febuxostat than allopurinol. The CARES trial results do not support first-line use of febuxostat ULT, and raise questions about febuxostat placement at various pharmacologic ULT decision tree branches. Alternatives to febuxostat that are frequently effective include allopurinol dose escalation and uricosuric therapy alone or combined with allopurinol. The FDA safety alert highlights the need for shared ULT medical decision-making with gout patients, including discussion of the CV safety of febuxostat.
最近,美国食品和药物管理局 (FDA) 发布了一项公共安全警报,回应现已发表的痛风和心血管疾病患者的非布司他和别嘌醇心血管安全性 (CARES) 试验结果。CARES 试验表明,在基线时患有痛风和已确立心血管合并症的受试者中,别嘌醇和非布司他在心血管 (CV) 事件的主要复合终点方面没有显著差异。然而,非布司他的 CV 和全因死亡率风险显著增加。降尿酸治疗 (ULT) 是痛风长期管理的核心,黄嘌呤氧化还原酶抑制剂 (XOI) 治疗是共识的一线治疗方法。别嘌醇通常是第一种使用的 XOI,但非布司他是一种有效的 XOI 选择,当不能耐受别嘌醇时通常会使用。由于 CV 合并症在痛风中很常见,这些数据更为相关。在这里,我们探讨了为什么要进行 CARES 试验,并讨论了其他正在进行的非布司他和别嘌醇比较研究,这些研究的结果正在等待中。我们评估了 CARES 试验的优势和局限性,并评估了结果的稳健性和生物学合理性。CARES 试验并不能证明非布司他会增加 CV 死亡率风险,但表明非布司他的风险高于别嘌醇。CARES 试验结果不支持一线使用非布司他 ULT,并对各种药理 ULT 决策树分支中非布司他的位置提出了质疑。非布司他的替代方案通常包括别嘌醇剂量递增和单独或联合使用尿酸排泄疗法,这些方案都非常有效。FDA 的安全警报强调了需要与痛风患者进行共同的 ULT 医疗决策,包括讨论非布司他的 CV 安全性。