Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology and Aquatic Ecology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2018 Sep;37(9):2380-2400. doi: 10.1002/etc.4185. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
It is generally assumed that as long as the majority of species experiences no direct adverse effects attributable to a single substance (i.e., potentially affected fraction [PAF] <5%), no significant structural or functional effects at the community level are expected to occur. Whether this assumption holds for mixed metal contamination is not known. In the present study, we tested this by performing a microcosm experiment in which a naturally occurring freshwater planktonic community was exposed to a copper-nickel-zinc (Cu-Ni-Zn) mixture for 8 wk and various structural and functional community-level traits were assessed. In the low mixture concentration treatments (i.e., Ni-Zn mixtures, because there was no difference in Cu concentrations in these treatments with the control), community-level effects were relatively simple, only involving phytoplankton species groups. In the high mixture concentration treatments (Cu-Ni-Zn mixtures), community-level effects were more complex, involving several phytoplankton and zooplankton species groups. Multisubstance PAF (msPAF) values for all mixture treatments were calculated by applying the concentration addition model to bioavailability-normalized single-metal species sensitivity distributions (SSDs). Consistent effects on the structural traits community composition, abundance of zooplankton species groups, species diversity, and species richness and on the functional trait dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentration (as a proxy for the microbial loop and pelagic food web interactions) were only observed at msPAF values >0.05 (i.e., in the Cu-Ni-Zn mixture). However, consistent effects on the abundance of various phytoplankton species groups (structural traits) and on 2 measures of community respiration, overnight Δ dissolved oxygen (ΔDO) and ΔpH (functional traits), were already observed at msPAF values of ≤0.05 (i.e., in the Ni-Zn mixture). This indicates that the threshold msPAF value of 0.05 was not protective against metal mixture exposure for all community-level structural and functional endpoints in the present study. A possible explanation for this result is the mismatch between the species in the SSD and those in our microcosm community. Indeed, our data suggest that the presence of one single dominant and very Zn- and/or Ni-sensitive species in the investigated community (i.e., a cyanobacteria of the genus Oscillatoria), which is not represented in the SSD of these metals, was probably the driver of all observed effects at or below an msPAF of 0.05. Overall, the present results show that SSDs are not necessarily a good predictor of community-level effects for all types of communities and that the presence of dominant sensitive species may result in significant, consistent effects on certain structural and functional community-level endpoints at msPAF values ≤0.05, which is generally considered protective in many regulatory frameworks. Environ Toxicol Chem 2018;37:2380-2400. © 2018 SETAC.
一般认为,只要大多数物种没有受到单一物质的直接不利影响(即潜在受影响分数[PAF]<5%),就不会在群落水平上产生显著的结构或功能影响。对于混合金属污染,这种假设是否成立尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们通过进行一个微宇宙实验来检验这一点,在该实验中,一个自然发生的淡水浮游生物群落暴露于铜-镍-锌(Cu-Ni-Zn)混合物中 8 周,并评估了各种结构和功能的群落水平特征。在低混合物浓度处理(即 Ni-Zn 混合物,因为这些处理与对照相比,Cu 浓度没有差异)中,群落水平的影响相对简单,仅涉及浮游植物物种群。在高混合物浓度处理(Cu-Ni-Zn 混合物)中,群落水平的影响更加复杂,涉及几个浮游植物和浮游动物物种群。通过将浓度加和模型应用于生物利用度归一化的单金属物种敏感性分布(SSD),计算了所有混合物处理的多物质 PAF(msPAF)值。只有在 msPAF 值>0.05(即 Cu-Ni-Zn 混合物)时,才观察到对结构特征群落组成、浮游动物物种群的丰度、物种多样性和物种丰富度以及功能特征溶解有机碳(DOC)浓度(作为微生物环和浮游生物网相互作用的替代物)的一致影响。然而,在 msPAF 值≤0.05(即 Ni-Zn 混合物)时,已经观察到对各种浮游植物物种群(结构特征)的丰度和对 2 项群落呼吸测量值,即过夜 Δ溶解氧(ΔDO)和 ΔpH(功能特征)的一致影响。这表明,对于本研究中所有群落水平的结构和功能终点,0.05 的阈值 msPAF 值并不能防止金属混合物暴露。对于这一结果的一个可能解释是 SSD 中的物种与我们微宇宙群落中的物种不匹配。事实上,我们的数据表明,在所研究的群落中存在一种单一的优势且非常敏感的 Zn 和/或 Ni 物种(即属于颤藻属的一种蓝藻),而这些金属的 SSD 中并没有该物种,这可能是在 0.05 以下的所有观察到的效应的驱动因素。总的来说,本研究结果表明,对于所有类型的群落,SSD 不一定是群落水平效应的良好预测因子,并且优势敏感物种的存在可能会导致在 0.05 以下的 msPAF 值下对某些结构和功能的群落水平终点产生显著、一致的影响,而这在许多监管框架中通常被认为是具有保护作用的。环境毒理化学 2018;37:2380-2400。