Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69210, Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Dermatology and National Center for Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2018 Aug;67(8):1261-1270. doi: 10.1007/s00262-018-2183-3. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
Immunotherapy has raised the issue of appropriate treatment response evaluation, due to the unique mechanism of action of the immunotherapeutic agents. Aim of this analysis is to evaluate the potential role of quantitative analysis of 2-deoxy-2-(F)fluoro-D-glucose (F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) data in monitoring of patients with metastatic melanoma undergoing ipilimumab therapy.
25 patients with unresectable metastatic melanoma underwent dynamic PET/CT (dPET/CT) of the thorax and upper abdomen as well as static, whole body PET/CT with F-FDG before the start of ipilimumab treatment (baseline PET/CT), after two cycles of treatment (interim PET/CT) and at the end of treatment after four cycles (late PET/CT). The evaluation of dPET/CT studies was based on semi-quantitative (standardized uptake value, SUV) calculation as well as quantitative analysis, based on two-tissue compartment modeling and a fractal approach. Patients' best clinical response, assessed at a mean of 59 weeks, was used as reference.
According to their best clinical response, patients were dichotomized in those demonstrating clinical benefit (CB, n = 16 patients) and those demonstrating no clinical benefit (no-CB, n = 9 patients). No statistically significant differences were observed between CB and no-CB regarding either semi-quantitative or quantitative parameters in all scans. On contrary, the application of the recently introduced PET response evaluation criteria for immunotherapy (PERCIMT) led to a correct classification rate of 84% (21/25 patients).
Quantitative analysis of F-FDG PET data does not provide additional information in treatment response evaluation of metastatic melanoma patients receiving ipilimumab. PERCIMT criteria correlated better with clinical response.
免疫疗法由于其免疫治疗药物的独特作用机制,提出了适当的治疗反应评估问题。本分析旨在评估定量分析 2-脱氧-2-(F)氟-D-葡萄糖(F-FDG)正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)数据在监测接受 ipilimumab 治疗的转移性黑色素瘤患者中的潜在作用。
25 例不可切除的转移性黑色素瘤患者在接受 ipilimumab 治疗前(基线 PET/CT)、两个周期治疗后(中期 PET/CT)和四个周期治疗结束时(晚期 PET/CT)进行了胸部和上腹部动态 PET/CT(dPET/CT)以及 F-FDG 全身静态 PET/CT。dPET/CT 研究的评估基于半定量(标准化摄取值,SUV)计算以及基于双组织室建模和分形方法的定量分析。以平均 59 周时评估的患者最佳临床反应作为参考。
根据最佳临床反应,患者分为表现出临床获益(CB,n=16 例)和未表现出临床获益(无-CB,n=9 例)。在所有扫描中,CB 和无-CB 之间在半定量或定量参数方面均未观察到统计学上的显著差异。相反,最近引入的免疫治疗 PET 反应评估标准(PERCIMT)的应用导致 84%(25 例患者中的 21 例)的正确分类率。
在接受 ipilimumab 治疗的转移性黑色素瘤患者的治疗反应评估中,F-FDG PET 数据的定量分析不能提供额外信息。PERCIMT 标准与临床反应相关性更好。