• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大安大略省非维生素 K 拮抗剂在房颤患者中应用的费用影响。

Impact of cost on use of non-vitamin K antagonists in atrial fibrillation patients in Ontario, Canada.

机构信息

Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2018 Oct;46(3):310-315. doi: 10.1007/s11239-018-1692-4.

DOI:10.1007/s11239-018-1692-4
PMID:29873002
Abstract

Canadian guidelines recommend non vitamin K antagonists (NOACs) in preference to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but NOACs are more expensive than VKAs. Canada has a universal healthcare system that covers the cost of NOACs for select patient groups. Ability to pay for NOACs may influence their use. We reviewed medical charts of Hamilton General Hospital outpatients under the age of 65 with a new diagnosis of AF who were referred for initiation of OAC therapy. We contacted these patients by phone and asked them to complete a questionnaire regarding their OAC choice, economic factors that may have influenced this choice (income, insurance) and the financial burden of OAC therapy. We included 110 patients, mean age 56 years, and 26.4% females. NOAC users had a higher median neighborhood income than VKA users (p = 0.0144, n = 110). 73 patients responded to the questionnaire. NOAC users reported higher annual household income (p = 0.0038, n = 73). Patients with private insurance were more likely to use NOACs than those without insurance (p = 0.0496, n = 73). The cost of NOACs and ability to pay is a determinant of their use Ontario patients under the age of 65. This two tiered provision of care appears to contradict the values of Canada's universal healthcare system.

摘要

加拿大指南建议,在预防房颤(AF)患者的中风方面,非维生素 K 拮抗剂(NOACs)优于维生素 K 拮抗剂(VKAs),但 NOACs 比 VKAs 更昂贵。加拿大拥有覆盖特定患者群体的 NOAC 费用的全民医疗保健系统。支付能力可能会影响 NOAC 的使用。我们查阅了汉密尔顿综合医院年龄在 65 岁以下、新诊断为 AF 的门诊患者的病历,这些患者被转诊接受 OAC 治疗。我们通过电话联系这些患者,询问他们有关 OAC 选择、可能影响这一选择的经济因素(收入、保险)以及 OAC 治疗的经济负担的问题,并完成了一份问卷。我们共纳入了 110 名患者,平均年龄为 56 岁,其中 26.4%为女性。NOAC 使用者的社区收入中位数高于 VKA 使用者(p=0.0144,n=110)。73 名患者对问卷做出了回应。NOAC 使用者报告的年收入较高(p=0.0038,n=73)。有私人保险的患者比没有保险的患者更有可能使用 NOAC(p=0.0496,n=73)。NOAC 的费用和支付能力是安大略省 65 岁以下患者使用它们的决定因素。这种两级医疗服务的提供方式似乎与加拿大全民医疗保健系统的价值观相矛盾。

相似文献

1
Impact of cost on use of non-vitamin K antagonists in atrial fibrillation patients in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省非维生素 K 拮抗剂在房颤患者中应用的费用影响。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2018 Oct;46(3):310-315. doi: 10.1007/s11239-018-1692-4.
2
Differences in knowledge among patients with atrial fibrillation receiving non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists.非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂和维生素 K 拮抗剂治疗的心房颤动患者的知识差异。
Kardiol Pol. 2018;76(7):1089-1096. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2018.0069. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
3
Vitamin K and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for non-valvular atrial fibrillation in real-life.维生素K与非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药用于非瓣膜性心房颤动的真实世界研究
Eur J Intern Med. 2016 Sep;33:42-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.06.022. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
4
Quality of life and patient satisfaction in patients with atrial fibrillation on stable vitamin K antagonist treatment or switched to a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant during a 1-year follow-up: A PREFER in AF Registry substudy.在 1 年随访期间,接受稳定维生素 K 拮抗剂治疗或换用非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂的心房颤动患者的生活质量和患者满意度:AF 登记处的 PREFER 子研究。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Feb;111(2):74-84. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
5
Economic evaluation of the use of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation on antiplatelet therapy: a modelling analysis using the healthcare system in the Netherlands.非维生素 K 口服抗凝剂在抗血小板治疗的房颤患者中的应用的经济学评价:利用荷兰医疗保健系统进行的建模分析。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2019 Apr 1;5(2):127-135. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcy030.
6
Use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation patients: insights from a specialist atrial fibrillation clinic.非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药在心房颤动患者中的应用:来自专科心房颤动诊所的见解
Int J Clin Pract. 2015 Nov;69(11):1341-8. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12712. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
7
Antithrombotic therapy use in patients with atrial fibrillation before the era of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants: the Global Registry on Long-Term Oral Antithrombotic Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (GLORIA-AF) Phase I cohort.非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药时代之前心房颤动患者的抗栓治疗:心房颤动患者长期口服抗栓治疗全球注册研究(GLORIA-AF)第一阶段队列研究
Europace. 2016 Sep;18(9):1308-18. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw073. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
8
Choice of New Oral Anticoagulant Agents Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Atrial Fibrillation: FANTASIIA Study.心房颤动中新型口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂的选择:FANTASIIA研究
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Mar;21(2):150-6. doi: 10.1177/1074248415596426. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
9
Antithrombotic Treatment Patterns in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: The GLORIA-AF Registry, Phase II.新发非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的抗血栓治疗模式:GLORIA-AF 登记研究,第二阶段。
Am J Med. 2015 Dec;128(12):1306-13.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.07.013. Epub 2015 Aug 1.
10
Portuguese Observational Study of Ischaemic Stroke in Patients Medicated with Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants.非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂治疗的缺血性中风患者的葡萄牙观察性研究
Eur Neurol. 2018;79(1-2):108-112. doi: 10.1159/000486755. Epub 2018 Feb 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-related medication nonadherence in Canada: a systematic review of prevalence, predictors, and clinical impact.加拿大与费用相关的药物治疗不依从性:患病率、预测因素及临床影响的系统评价
Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 6;10(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01558-5.
2
Determinants of anticoagulant therapy in atrial fibrillation at discharge from a geriatric ward: cross sectional study.老年病房出院时房颤抗凝治疗的决定因素:横断面研究。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020 Jan;49(1):18-26. doi: 10.1007/s11239-019-01937-3.

本文引用的文献

1
The Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Selection of Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation.社会经济地位对心房颤动抗凝治疗选择的影响
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 25;11(2):e0149142. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149142. eCollection 2016.
2
Factors driving anticoagulant selection in patients with atrial fibrillation in the United States.美国心房颤动患者抗凝药物选择的驱动因素。
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Apr 15;115(8):1095-101. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.539. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
3
Rates of hemorrhage during warfarin therapy for atrial fibrillation.
华法林治疗心房颤动期间的出血率。
CMAJ. 2013 Feb 5;185(2):E121-7. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.121218. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
4
A pilot study on cost-related medication nonadherence in Ontario.安大略省与费用相关的药物治疗不依从性的一项试点研究。
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2012;19(2):e239-47. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
5
Focused 2012 update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society atrial fibrillation guidelines: recommendations for stroke prevention and rate/rhythm control.加拿大心血管学会 2012 年心房颤动指南重点更新:卒中预防和节律/心率控制推荐。
Can J Cardiol. 2012 Mar-Apr;28(2):125-36. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2012.01.021.
6
Underuse of oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review.房颤患者中口服抗凝剂的使用率较低:一项系统评价。
Am J Med. 2010 Jul;123(7):638-645.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.11.025.
7
Cost-related prescription nonadherence in the United States and Canada: a system-level comparison using the 2007 International Health Policy Survey in Seven Countries.美国和加拿大与费用相关的处方不依从性:使用2007年七国国际卫生政策调查进行的系统层面比较。
Clin Ther. 2009 Jan;31(1):213-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.01.006.
8
Potentially preventable strokes in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation who are not adequately anticoagulated.在未接受充分抗凝治疗的高危房颤患者中可能可预防的中风。
Stroke. 2009 Jan;40(1):235-40. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.516344. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
9
Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.荟萃分析:抗栓治疗预防非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的卒中
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Jun 19;146(12):857-67. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-12-200706190-00007.
10
Patient-reported underuse of prescription medications: a comparison of nine surveys.患者报告的处方药使用不足:九项调查的比较
Med Care Res Rev. 2006 Aug;63(4):427-46. doi: 10.1177/1077558706288845.