Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Aug;33(8):1114-1120. doi: 10.1002/gps.4900. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
To determine the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between diabetes treatment type and cognitive outcomes among type II diabetics.
We examined the association between metformin use, as compared to other diabetic treatment (ie, insulin, other oral medications, and diet/exercise) and cognitive test performance and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) diagnosis among 508 cognitively unimpaired at baseline type II diabetics enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. We created propensity scores to adjust for treatment effects. We used multivariate linear and logistic regression models to investigate the cross-sectional association between treatment type and cognitive test z scores, respectively. Mixed effects models and competing risk regression models were used to determine the longitudinal association between treatment type and change in cognitive test z scores and risk of developing incident MCI.
In linear regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, education, body mass index, APOE ε4, insulin treatment, medical comorbidities, number of medications, duration of diabetes, and propensity score, we did not observe an association between metformin use and cognitive test performance. Additionally, we did not observe an association between metformin use and cognitive test performance over time (median = 3.7-year follow-up). Metformin was associated with an increased risk of MCI (subhazard ratio (SHR) = 2.75; 95% CI = 1.64, 4.63, P < .001). Similarly, other oral medications (SHR = 1.96; 95% CI = 1.19, 3.25; P = .009) and insulin (SHR = 3.17; 95% CI = 1.27, 7.92; P = .014) use were also associated with risk of MCI diagnosis.
These findings suggest that metformin use, as compared to management of diabetes with other treatments, is not associated with cognitive test performance. However, metformin was associated with incident MCI diagnosis.
确定 2 型糖尿病患者的糖尿病治疗类型与认知结果之间的横断面和纵向关联。
我们研究了二甲双胍的使用(与其他糖尿病治疗方法相比,即胰岛素、其他口服药物和饮食/运动)与认知测试表现和基线时认知正常的 508 例 2 型糖尿病患者中轻度认知障碍(MCI)诊断之间的关系。我们创建了倾向评分来调整治疗效果。我们分别使用多元线性和逻辑回归模型来研究治疗类型与认知测试 z 分数之间的横断面关联。使用混合效应模型和竞争风险回归模型来确定治疗类型与认知测试 z 分数变化以及发生 MCI 的风险之间的纵向关联。
在调整年龄、性别、教育程度、体重指数、APOE ε4、胰岛素治疗、合并症、用药数量、糖尿病病程和倾向评分后,线性回归分析未发现二甲双胍使用与认知测试表现之间存在关联。此外,我们未观察到二甲双胍使用与认知测试表现随时间的变化之间存在关联(中位数随访时间为 3.7 年)。二甲双胍与 MCI 的风险增加相关(亚危险比(SHR)=2.75;95%置信区间(CI)=1.64,4.63,P<0.001)。同样,其他口服药物(SHR=1.96;95%CI=1.19,3.25;P=0.009)和胰岛素(SHR=3.17;95%CI=1.27,7.92;P=0.014)的使用也与 MCI 诊断的风险相关。
这些发现表明,与其他治疗方法相比,二甲双胍的使用与认知测试表现无关。然而,二甲双胍与新发 MCI 诊断相关。