Baird S C, Biegel A, Bopp A, Dolphin N W, Ernst N, Hagedorn M, Malkiewicz J, Payton R J, Sawatzky G
J Nurs Educ. 1985 Apr;24(4):143-7. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-19850401-06.
In an attempt to address the question of what activities should be considered scholarly, thereby warranting their inclusion in a nursing faculty evaluation model, a study was undertaken which surveyed all National League for Nursing accredited baccalaureate educational programs. The items in the instrument were generated utilizing the Delphi method and a pilot study established inter-respondent reliability. A response rate of 73% was attained. Scholarly activity was considered highly important in evaluation for promotion and tenure in over 50% of the schools. There were distinct differences in the activities deemed scholarly when respondents were broken down into categories such as size and type of institution and the existence or non-existence of graduate nursing programs in the same institution.
为了探讨哪些活动应被视为学术性活动，从而有理由将其纳入护理教师评估模型，开展了一项研究，对所有经美国护理联盟认证的学士学位教育项目进行了调查。该工具中的项目采用德尔菲法生成，一项预研究确定了受访者之间的信度。获得了73%的回复率。超过50%的学校认为学术活动在晋升和终身教职评估中非常重要。当按机构规模和类型以及同一机构中是否存在研究生护理项目等类别对受访者进行分类时，在被视为学术性的活动方面存在明显差异。
