• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新引入的C点系统、冷侧方加压和热塑牙胶充填技术封闭能力的比较与评价:一项染料渗出研究

An Comparison and Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Newly Introduced C-point System, Cold Lateral Condensation, and Thermoplasticized Gutta-Percha Obturating Technique: A Dye Extraction Study.

作者信息

Sinhal Tapati Manohar, Shah Ruchi Rani Purvesh, Jais Pratik Subhas, Shah Nimisha Chinmay, Hadwani Krupali Dhirubhai, Rothe Tushar, Sinhal Neha Nilesh

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, K M Shah Dental College and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, K M Shah Dental College and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Apr-Jun;9(2):164-169. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_722_17.

DOI:10.4103/ccd.ccd_722_17
PMID:29875554
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5968676/
Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study is to compare and to evaluate sealing ability of newly introduced C-point system, cold lateral condensation, and thermoplasticized gutta-percha obturating technique using a dye extraction method.

MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY

Sixty extracted maxillary central incisors were decoronated below the cementoenamel junction. Working length was established, and biomechanical preparation was done using K3 rotary files with standard irrigation protocol. Teeth were divided into three groups according to the obturation protocol; Group I-Cold lateral condensation, Group II-Thermoplasticized gutta-percha, and Group III-C-Point obturating system. After obturation all samples were subjected to microleakage assessment using dye extraction method. Obtained scores will be statistical analyzed using ANOVA test and Tukey's test.

RESULTS

One-way analysis of variance revealed that there is significant difference among the three groups with value (0.000 < 0.05). Tukey's HSD tests for multiple comparisons test shows that the Group II and III perform significantly better than Group I. Group III performs better than Group II with no significant difference.

CONCLUSION

All the obturating technique showed some degree of microleakage. Root canals filled with C-point system showed least microleakage followed by thermoplasticized obturating technique with no significant difference among them. C-point obturation system could be an alternative to the cold lateral condensation technique.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在采用染料渗出法比较并评估新引入的C点系统、冷侧方加压充填法和热塑牙胶充填技术的封闭能力。

材料与方法

60颗拔除的上颌中切牙在牙骨质釉质界下方截冠。确定工作长度,采用K3旋转锉并按照标准冲洗方案进行生物力学预备。根据充填方案将牙齿分为三组;第一组-冷侧方加压充填,第二组-热塑牙胶充填,第三组-C点充填系统。充填后,所有样本采用染料渗出法进行微渗漏评估。所得分数将采用方差分析(ANOVA)检验和Tukey检验进行统计学分析。

结果

单因素方差分析显示三组之间存在显著差异,P值(0.000 < 0.05)。Tukey's HSD多重比较检验表明,第二组和第三组的表现明显优于第一组。第三组的表现优于第二组,但无显著差异。

结论

所有充填技术均表现出一定程度的微渗漏。采用C点系统充填的根管微渗漏最少,其次是热塑充填技术,两者之间无显著差异。C点充填系统可作为冷侧方加压充填技术的替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd3/5968676/83c03a715bde/CCD-9-164-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd3/5968676/83c03a715bde/CCD-9-164-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd3/5968676/83c03a715bde/CCD-9-164-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
An Comparison and Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Newly Introduced C-point System, Cold Lateral Condensation, and Thermoplasticized Gutta-Percha Obturating Technique: A Dye Extraction Study.新引入的C点系统、冷侧方加压和热塑牙胶充填技术封闭能力的比较与评价:一项染料渗出研究
Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Apr-Jun;9(2):164-169. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_722_17.
2
Sealing ability of lateral condensation, thermoplasticized gutta-percha and flowable gutta-percha obturation techniques: A comparative in vitro study.侧方加压、热塑牙胶和可流动牙胶充填技术的封闭能力:一项体外比较研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2012 Aug;4(Suppl 2):S131-5. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.100211.
3
Sealing Ability Comparison of Three Different Obturating Systems to Intraradicular Dentin-An Stereomicroscopic Study.三种不同充填系统对根管内牙本质封闭能力的比较——一项体视显微镜研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Feb;16(Suppl 1):S733-S735. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_978_23. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
4
Comparison of laterally condensed and low-temperature thermoplasticized gutta-percha root fillings.侧向加压和低温热塑牙胶根管充填的比较。
J Endod. 2000 Dec;26(12):733-8. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200012000-00018.
5
Comparison of cold lateral condensation and a warm multiphase gutta-percha technique for obturating curved root canals.冷侧向加压法与热塑多相牙胶技术用于弯曲根管充填的比较
Int Endod J. 2000 Sep;33(5):415-20. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00322.x.
6
Qualitative and quantitative comparative evaluation of sealing ability of guttaflow, thermoplasticized gutta percha and lateral compaction for root canal obturation: a cohort, controlled, ex-vivo study.牙胶流体、热塑牙胶和侧向加压法用于根管充填时封闭能力的定性与定量比较评估:一项队列对照离体研究。
Oral Health Dent Manag. 2013 Sep;12(3):155-61.
7
Evaluation and comparison of sealing ability of three different obturation techniques - Lateral condensation, Obtura II, and GuttaFlow: An in vitro study.三种不同充填技术——侧方加压充填法、Obtura II 充填法和 GuttaFlow 充填法的封闭能力评估与比较:一项体外研究
J Conserv Dent. 2011 Jan;14(1):57-61. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.80748.
8
An in vitro comparison of thermoplasticised gutta-percha obturation techniques with cold lateral condensation.热塑牙胶充填技术与冷侧方加压充填技术的体外比较
Endod Dent Traumatol. 1998 Dec;14(6):262-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1998.tb00850.x.
9
An In-Vitro Evaluation and Comparison of Apical Sealing Ability of Three Different Obturation Technique - Lateral Condensation, Obtura II, and Thermafil.三种不同充填技术——侧方加压充填、Obtura II 和 Thermafil 的根尖封闭能力的体外评估与比较
J Int Oral Health. 2013 Apr;5(2):35-43.
10
Comparison of Push-out Bond Strength of Three Different Obturating Systems to Intraradicular Dentin: An Study.三种不同根管充填系统与根管内牙本质之间推出粘结强度的比较:一项研究。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2019 Oct-Dec;10(4):631-636. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_640_18.

引用本文的文献

1
An automated method to analyze root filling voids and gaps using confocal microscopy images.利用共聚焦显微镜图像分析根管充填空隙和间隙的自动化方法。
Odontology. 2024 Apr;112(2):546-551. doi: 10.1007/s10266-023-00859-0. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
2
The Effect of Different Obturation Techniques in Primary Teeth on the Apical Microleakage using Endoflas: A Comparative In Vitro Study.使用Endoflas研究不同充填技术对乳牙根尖微渗漏的影响:一项体外对照研究
Int J Dent. 2023 Mar 31;2023:4982980. doi: 10.1155/2023/4982980. eCollection 2023.
3
Synthesis and characterization of calcium-releasing elastomeric resin-based endodontic sealers.

本文引用的文献

1
Facile and Scalable Preparation of Graphene Oxide-Based Magnetic Hybrids for Fast and Highly Efficient Removal of Organic Dyes.用于快速高效去除有机染料的氧化石墨烯基磁性杂化物的简便且可扩展的制备方法。
Sci Rep. 2015 Jul 29;5:12451. doi: 10.1038/srep12451.
2
Sealing ability of a novel hydrophilic vs. conventional hydrophobic obturation systems: A bacterial leakage study.新型亲水与传统疏水封闭系统的封闭能力:一项细菌渗漏研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2015 Jan-Feb;18(1):62-5. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.148898.
3
A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Different Obturation Techniques used in Root Canal Treatment of Anterior Teeth: An in vitro Study.
合成与表征基于释钙弹性树脂的根管封闭剂。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Jul;27(7):3447-3456. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04952-0. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
4
An In Vitro Comparative Evaluation of Apical Leakage Using Different Root Canal Sealers.使用不同根管封闭剂对根尖微渗漏的体外比较评估
Med Sci Monit Basic Res. 2020 Nov 25;26:e928175. doi: 10.12659/MSMBR.928175.
5
Egyptian Propolis-Loaded Nanoparticles as a Root Canal Nanosealer: Sealing Ability and in vivo Biocompatibility.埃及蜂胶负载纳米粒子作为根管纳米密封剂:密封能力和体内生物相容性。
Int J Nanomedicine. 2020 Jul 27;15:5265-5277. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S258888. eCollection 2020.
不同充填技术在前牙根管治疗中疗效的比较评估:一项体外研究
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014 Jan;7(1):1-5. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1224. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
4
Comparative evaluation of a novel smart-seal obturating system and its homogeneity of using cone beam computed tomography: In vitro simulated lateral canal study.新型智能封闭充填系统及其使用锥形束计算机断层扫描的均匀性的比较评估:体外模拟侧支根管研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2014 Jul;17(4):364-8. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.136512.
5
Qualitative and quantitative comparative evaluation of sealing ability of guttaflow, thermoplasticized gutta percha and lateral compaction for root canal obturation: a cohort, controlled, ex-vivo study.牙胶流体、热塑牙胶和侧向加压法用于根管充填时封闭能力的定性与定量比较评估:一项队列对照离体研究。
Oral Health Dent Manag. 2013 Sep;12(3):155-61.
6
Sealing ability of three single-cone obturation systems: An in-vitro glucose leakage study.三种单尖充填系统的封闭能力:一项体外葡萄糖渗漏研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2013 Nov;16(6):489-93. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.120936.
7
An In-Vitro Evaluation and Comparison of Apical Sealing Ability of Three Different Obturation Technique - Lateral Condensation, Obtura II, and Thermafil.三种不同充填技术——侧方加压充填、Obtura II 和 Thermafil 的根尖封闭能力的体外评估与比较
J Int Oral Health. 2013 Apr;5(2):35-43.
8
Time-based lateral hygroscopic expansion of a water-expandable endodontic obturation point.水可膨胀性根管充填尖基于时间的横向吸湿膨胀
J Dent. 2013 Sep;41(9):796-801. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.06.012. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
9
Quality of root fillings performed with two root filling techniques. An in vitro study using micro-CT.两种根管充填技术的根管充填质量。使用 micro-CT 的体外研究。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2013 May-Jul;71(3-4):689-96. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2012.715192. Epub 2012 Nov 13.
10
Qualitative evaluation of two endodontic obturation techniques: tapered single-cone method versus warm vertical condensation and injection system: an in vitro study.两种根管充填技术的定性评估:锥形单尖法与热垂直加压和注射系统:一项体外研究
J Oral Sci. 2012 Mar;54(1):99-104. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.54.99.