Suppr超能文献

利用先前环志鸟类的数据估算被雾网捕获用于环志的雀形目鸟类的死亡率。

Estimating mortality rates among passerines caught for ringing with mist nets using data from previously ringed birds.

作者信息

Clewley Gary D, Robinson Robert A, Clark Jacquie A

机构信息

BTO The Nunnery Thetford UK.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2018 Apr 26;8(10):5164-5172. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4032. eCollection 2018 May.

Abstract

Mist netting is the most commonly used method for catching birds for scientific ringing, but despite decades of use, there have been few attempts to quantify the associated potential risks to the individuals caught. Any incidence of mortality through capture and handling, however low, is of potential ethical concern and may also introduce biases into the data. We estimate the mortality rate associated with capture of previously ringed (recaptured) passerines from the British and Irish Ringing Scheme (c. 1.5 million records) caught using mist nets. The importance of species, age, mass, month, time, previous captures, and an index of predator occurrence was tested using generalized linear mixed-effects models. The average mortality rate was 0.0011, most of which was reported to occur before the individuals had been extracted from the nets (c. 70% of incidents). Juveniles appeared to be at higher risk and the incidence of predation from mist nets was seasonal, with increased risk during the winter. Species differed in their reported mortality rates with the apparent risk being greatest for Chiffchaff (0.0029) and Bullfinch (0.0027). To improve our understanding (and hence minimize risk in future), we recommend collecting more complete data on incidences of mortality, and also injuries; exercising increased care when the species we have identified as being at greater risk are likely to be captured, and ensuring there are robust procedures for the checking of nets (as most reported incidents of mortality occur before handling). We also recommend that all Ringing Schemes should collate and make available data on capture-related mortality. Overall rates of mortality associated with capture, although, were low and support the use of mist netting as a safe capture technique, without undue bias from mortality, when used by appropriately trained individuals.

摘要

雾网捕鸟是科学环志中最常用的捕鸟方法,但尽管已使用数十年,却很少有人尝试量化捕获个体所面临的潜在风险。任何因捕获和处理导致的死亡事件,无论概率多低,都存在潜在的伦理问题,还可能使数据产生偏差。我们估算了通过雾网捕获的来自英国和爱尔兰环志计划(约150万条记录)中先前已环志(再捕获)雀形目鸟类的死亡率。使用广义线性混合效应模型检验了物种、年龄、体重、月份、时间、先前捕获情况以及捕食者出现指数的重要性。平均死亡率为0.0011,其中大部分据报告发生在个体从网中取出之前(约70%的事件)。幼鸟似乎风险更高,雾网捕食发生率具有季节性,冬季风险增加。不同物种报告的死亡率不同,柳莺(0.0029)和红腹灰雀(0.0027)的明显风险最大。为增进了解(从而在未来将风险降至最低),我们建议收集更完整的死亡事件以及受伤情况的数据;在可能捕获我们已确定风险较高的物种时格外小心,并确保有严格的网检查程序(因为大多数报告的死亡事件发生在处理之前)。我们还建议所有环志计划应整理并提供与捕获相关的死亡率数据。不过,与捕获相关的总体死亡率较低,这支持了雾网捕鸟作为一种安全捕获技术的使用,由经过适当培训的人员使用时,不会因死亡率产生不当偏差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b10a/5980556/db06a548f646/ECE3-8-5164-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验