• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从文献和数据库挖掘的断言中预测药物不良反应。

Predicting Adverse Drug Effects from Literature- and Database-Mined Assertions.

机构信息

Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, 301 Pharmacy Lane, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.

Laboratory for Molecular Modeling, Division of Chemical Biology and Medicinal Chemistry, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, 301 Pharmacy Lane, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.

出版信息

Drug Saf. 2018 Nov;41(11):1059-1072. doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-0688-5.

DOI:10.1007/s40264-018-0688-5
PMID:29876834
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6212308/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Given that adverse drug effects (ADEs) have led to post-market patient harm and subsequent drug withdrawal, failure of candidate agents in the drug development process, and other negative outcomes, it is essential to attempt to forecast ADEs and other relevant drug-target-effect relationships as early as possible. Current pharmacologic data sources, providing multiple complementary perspectives on the drug-target-effect paradigm, can be integrated to facilitate the inference of relationships between these entities.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to identify both existing and unknown relationships between chemicals (C), protein targets (T), and ADEs (E) based on evidence in the literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cheminformatics and data mining approaches were employed to integrate and analyze publicly available clinical pharmacology data and literature assertions interrelating drugs, targets, and ADEs. Based on these assertions, a C-T-E relationship knowledge base was developed. Known pairwise relationships between chemicals, targets, and ADEs were collected from several pharmacological and biomedical data sources. These relationships were curated and integrated according to Swanson's paradigm to form C-T-E triangles. Missing C-E edges were then inferred as C-E relationships.

RESULTS

Unreported associations between drugs, targets, and ADEs were inferred, and inferences were prioritized as testable hypotheses. Several C-E inferences, including testosterone → myocardial infarction, were identified using inferences based on the literature sources published prior to confirmatory case reports. Timestamping approaches confirmed the predictive ability of this inference strategy on a larger scale.

CONCLUSIONS

The presented workflow, based on free-access databases and an association-based inference scheme, provided novel C-E relationships that have been validated post hoc in case reports. With refinement of prioritization schemes for the generated C-E inferences, this workflow may provide an effective computational method for the early detection of potential drug candidate ADEs that can be followed by targeted experimental investigations.

摘要

简介

由于药物不良反应 (ADE) 导致了上市后患者伤害和随后的药物撤市,候选药物在药物开发过程中的失败,以及其他负面结果,因此尽早尝试预测 ADE 和其他相关药物-靶标-效应关系至关重要。当前的药理学数据源提供了药物-靶标-效应范式的多个互补视角,可以进行整合,以促进这些实体之间关系的推断。

目的

本研究旨在根据文献中的证据,识别化学物质 (C)、蛋白质靶标 (T) 和 ADE 之间现有的和未知的关系。

材料和方法

采用化学信息学和数据挖掘方法,整合和分析公开的临床药理学数据和文献中药物、靶标和 ADE 之间的关联。基于这些关联,开发了一个 C-T-E 关系知识库。从几个药理学和生物医学数据来源收集了已知的化学物质、靶标和 ADE 之间的成对关系。这些关系根据 Swanson 的范式进行了整理和整合,形成了 C-T-E 三角形。然后推断缺失的 C-E 边作为 C-E 关系。

结果

推断出了药物、靶标和 ADE 之间未报告的关联,并将推断作为可测试的假设进行了优先级排序。使用基于发表于确认病例报告之前的文献来源的推断,识别出了几个 C-E 推断,包括睾酮→心肌梗死。时间戳方法在更大的范围内证实了这种推断策略的预测能力。

结论

所提出的基于免费访问数据库和基于关联的推断方案的工作流程,提供了新的 C-E 关系,这些关系已在病例报告中事后验证。通过细化生成的 C-E 推断的优先级排序方案,该工作流程可能为早期检测潜在药物候选 ADE 提供一种有效的计算方法,随后可以进行有针对性的实验研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f01/6212308/16d84671cb0d/nihms973436f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f01/6212308/5c15dda21894/nihms973436f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f01/6212308/7af2f4898df4/nihms973436f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f01/6212308/469d7ac9cb16/nihms973436f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f01/6212308/6a0e177f688d/nihms973436f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f01/6212308/ac9c01be327f/nihms973436f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f01/6212308/16d84671cb0d/nihms973436f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f01/6212308/5c15dda21894/nihms973436f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f01/6212308/7af2f4898df4/nihms973436f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f01/6212308/469d7ac9cb16/nihms973436f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f01/6212308/6a0e177f688d/nihms973436f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f01/6212308/ac9c01be327f/nihms973436f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f01/6212308/16d84671cb0d/nihms973436f6.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting Adverse Drug Effects from Literature- and Database-Mined Assertions.从文献和数据库挖掘的断言中预测药物不良反应。
Drug Saf. 2018 Nov;41(11):1059-1072. doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-0688-5.
2
Adverse drug events: database construction and in silico prediction.药物不良反应:数据库构建与计算机预测。
J Chem Inf Model. 2013 Apr 22;53(4):744-52. doi: 10.1021/ci4000079. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
3
Leveraging graph topology and semantic context for pharmacovigilance through twitter-streams.通过推特流利用图拓扑结构和语义上下文进行药物警戒
BMC Bioinformatics. 2016 Oct 6;17(Suppl 13):335. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1220-5.
4
Data mining methodology for response to hypertension symptomology-application to COVID-19-related pharmacovigilance.数据挖掘方法在高血压症状反应中的应用-在 COVID-19 相关药物警戒中的应用。
Elife. 2021 Nov 23;10:e70734. doi: 10.7554/eLife.70734.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
A data-driven method to detect adverse drug events from prescription data.一种从处方数据中检测药物不良事件的数据驱动方法。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Sep;85:10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
7
Mining multi-item drug adverse effect associations in spontaneous reporting systems.挖掘自发报告系统中的多药物不良反应关联。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Oct 28;11 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):S7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-S9-S7.
8
Feasibility of Prioritizing Drug-Drug-Event Associations Found in Electronic Health Records.对电子健康记录中发现的药物-药物-事件关联进行优先级排序的可行性
Drug Saf. 2016 Jan;39(1):45-57. doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0352-2.
9
A method for systematic discovery of adverse drug events from clinical notes.一种从临床记录中系统发现药物不良事件的方法。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Nov;22(6):1196-204. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv102. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
10
Sex differences in text-mined possible adverse drug events associated with drugs for psychosis.基于文本挖掘的精神类药物相关不良药物事件的性别差异。
J Psychopharmacol. 2020 May;34(5):532-539. doi: 10.1177/0269881120903466. Epub 2020 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine Learning Techniques for Predicting Drug-Related Side Effects: A Scoping Review.用于预测药物相关副作用的机器学习技术:一项范围综述
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Jun 17;17(6):795. doi: 10.3390/ph17060795.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of free text in electronic health records for identification of cancer patient trajectories.电子健康记录中自由文本的分析用于识别癌症患者轨迹。
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 7;7:46226. doi: 10.1038/srep46226.
2
Fundamental Concepts Regarding Testosterone Deficiency and Treatment: International Expert Consensus Resolutions.关于睾酮缺乏和治疗的基本概念:国际专家共识决议。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2016 Jul;91(7):881-96. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.04.007. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
3
Trust, but Verify II: A Practical Guide to Chemogenomics Data Curation.《信任,但需验证II:化学基因组学数据管理实用指南》
J Chem Inf Model. 2016 Jul 25;56(7):1243-52. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00129. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
4
Therapeutic target database update 2016: enriched resource for bench to clinical drug target and targeted pathway information.《治疗靶点数据库2016年更新:从实验台到临床的药物靶点及靶向通路信息的丰富资源》
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jan 4;44(D1):D1069-74. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1230. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
5
Curation of chemogenomics data.化学基因组学数据的管理
Nat Chem Biol. 2015 Aug;11(8):535. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1881.
6
Exploring relation types for literature-based discovery.探索基于文献的发现中的关系类型。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Sep;22(5):987-92. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv002. Epub 2015 May 13.
7
UniProt: a hub for protein information.通用蛋白质数据库(UniProt):蛋白质信息中心。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Jan;43(Database issue):D204-12. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku989. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
8
Identifying plausible adverse drug reactions using knowledge extracted from the literature.利用从文献中提取的知识识别可能的药物不良反应。
J Biomed Inform. 2014 Dec;52:293-310. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.07.011. Epub 2014 Jul 19.
9
Panacea, a semantic-enabled drug recommendations discovery framework.万灵药,一个支持语义的药物推荐发现框架。
J Biomed Semantics. 2014 Mar 6;5(1):13. doi: 10.1186/2041-1480-5-13.
10
Increased risk of non-fatal myocardial infarction following testosterone therapy prescription in men.男性使用睾酮治疗处方后非致命性心肌梗死风险增加。
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 29;9(1):e85805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085805. eCollection 2014.