文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

交叉至双侧重复经颅磁刺激:当患者对单侧左侧高频重复经颅磁刺激无反应时的一种潜在策略。

Crossover to Bilateral Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Potential Strategy When Patients Are Not Responding to Unilateral Left-Sided High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

作者信息

Cristancho Pilar, Trapp Nicholas T, Siddiqi Shan H, Dixon David, Miller J Philip, Lenze Eric J

机构信息

University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics, Iowa City, IA.

Division of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO.

出版信息

J ECT. 2019 Mar;35(1):3-5. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000500.


DOI:10.1097/YCT.0000000000000500
PMID:29877963
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6281787/
Abstract

Clinical trials using left-sided repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) report remission rates of 14% to 32.6%. A large percentage of patients would not achieve remission with standard rTMS treatment. The question of what clinicians should do when a patient is not responding to standard high-frequency (HF) left-sided rTMS remains unanswered. This prospective case series examines whether crossover to bilateral stimulation enhances antidepressant outcomes in patients not responding to unilateral rTMS. Patients in a major depressive episode received an rTMS clinical protocol of 4 to 6 weeks' duration. Stimulation began with HF rTMS (10 Hz) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (range, 3000-5000 pulses per session). A total of 17 patients without sufficient clinical improvement early in their rTMS course received 1-Hz rTMS (range, 600-1200 pps) over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (added to the HF left-sided stimulation). Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores decreased from 13.9 ± 3.9 (mean ± SD) from the start of augmentation to 12.2 ± 5.8 at the end of acute treatment, a 1.7-point change, Cohen d effect size = -0.35, 95% confidence interval, -1.01 to - 0.34, suggesting improvement. Remission rate in this sample was 24% (4/17). This case series indicates that crossover to bilateral stimulation is a feasible and potentially effective strategy when patients are not improving with standard rTMS. A randomized controlled trial comparing crossover versus standard rTMS is needed to determine the efficacy of this paradigm.

摘要

使用左侧重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)的临床试验报告缓解率为14%至32.6%。很大一部分患者采用标准rTMS治疗无法实现缓解。当患者对标准高频(HF)左侧rTMS无反应时,临床医生该怎么做这个问题仍未得到解答。本前瞻性病例系列研究了对于单侧rTMS无反应的患者,交叉采用双侧刺激是否能增强抗抑郁效果。重度抑郁发作的患者接受了为期4至6周的rTMS临床方案。刺激始于左侧背外侧前额叶皮质的高频rTMS(10赫兹)(每次治疗3000 - 5000脉冲)。共有17例在rTMS治疗早期临床改善不足的患者,在右侧背外侧前额叶皮质接受1赫兹rTMS(600 - 1200次/秒)(添加到高频左侧刺激中)。汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分从强化开始时的13.9±3.9(均值±标准差)降至急性治疗结束时的12.2±5.8,变化1.7分,科恩d效应量 = -0.35,95%置信区间为 -1.01至 -0.34,提示有改善。该样本中的缓解率为24%(4/17)。本病例系列表明,当患者采用标准rTMS无改善时,交叉采用双侧刺激是一种可行且可能有效的策略。需要进行一项比较交叉刺激与标准rTMS的随机对照试验来确定该模式的疗效。

相似文献

[1]
Crossover to Bilateral Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Potential Strategy When Patients Are Not Responding to Unilateral Left-Sided High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

J ECT. 2019-3

[2]
Efficacy of intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) and 10-Hz high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in treatment-resistant unipolar depression: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Trials. 2017-1-13

[3]
Unilateral and bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant late-life depression.

Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019-4-8

[4]
A randomized trial of unilateral and bilateral prefrontal cortex transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment-resistant major depression.

Psychol Med. 2010-10-7

[5]
[Health-related quality of life assessment in depression after low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation].

Encephale. 2014-2

[6]
Effectiveness of theta burst versus high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with depression (THREE-D): a randomised non-inferiority trial.

Lancet. 2018-4-26

[7]
Exploring alternative rTMS strategies in non-responders to standard high frequency left-sided treatment: A switching study.

J Affect Disord. 2018-2-17

[8]
A double blind randomized trial of unilateral left and bilateral prefrontal cortex transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment resistant major depression.

J Affect Disord. 2012-3-5

[9]
Equivalent beneficial effects of unilateral and bilateral prefrontal cortex transcranial magnetic stimulation in a large randomized trial in treatment-resistant major depression.

Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013-5-13

[10]
Effectiveness of Standard Sequential Bilateral Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation vs Bilateral Theta Burst Stimulation in Older Adults With Depression: The FOUR-D Randomized Noninferiority Clinical Trial.

JAMA Psychiatry. 2022-11-1

引用本文的文献

[1]
Bilateral rTMS Shows No Advantage in Depression nor in Comorbid Depression and Anxiety: A Naturalistic Study.

Psychiatr Q. 2024-3

[2]
Graph Theory Analysis of the Cortical Functional Network During Sleep in Patients With Depression.

Front Physiol. 2022-5-27

[3]
Early Improvement Predicts Clinical Outcomes Similarly in 10 Hz rTMS and iTBS Therapy for Depression.

Front Psychiatry. 2022-5-11

本文引用的文献

[1]
A naturalistic, multi-site study of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy for depression.

J Affect Disord. 2017-1-15

[2]
Efficacy and safety of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.

World Psychiatry. 2015-2

[3]
Clinically meaningful efficacy and acceptability of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treating primary major depression: a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials.

Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012-11-19

[4]
Effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice post-FDA approval in the United States: results observed with the first 100 consecutive cases of depression at an academic medical center.

J Clin Psychiatry. 2012-4

[5]
Efficacy of adjunctive aripiprazole in patients with major depressive disorder who showed minimal response to initial antidepressant therapy.

Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012-5

[6]
Improving the antidepressant efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation: maximizing the number of stimulations and treatment location in treatment-resistant depression.

Depress Anxiety. 2011-9-2

[7]
An efficient and accurate new method for locating the F3 position for prefrontal TMS applications.

Brain Stimul. 2009-1

[8]
Daily left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy for major depressive disorder: a sham-controlled randomized trial.

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010-5

[9]
Antidepressant efficacy of high-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in double-blind sham-controlled designs: a meta-analysis.

Psychol Med. 2009-1

[10]
Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the acute treatment of major depressive disorder: clinical response in an open-label extension trial.

J Clin Psychiatry. 2008-3

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索