Suppr超能文献

鉴别出托珠单抗、阿达木单抗和托法替尼单药治疗及其与甲氨蝶呤联合治疗的表型特征。

Discriminating phenotypic signatures identified for tocilizumab, adalimumab, and tofacitinib monotherapy and their combinations with methotrexate.

机构信息

BioMAP Division, Eurofins DiscoverX, 310 Utah Avenue, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.

F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, 4070, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Transl Med. 2018 Jun 7;16(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12967-018-1532-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials have shown combinations of anti-tumor necrosis factor biologicals plus methotrexate (MTX) are more effective treatments for rheumatoid arthritis than biological monotherapies, based, in part, on the assumption that MTX reduces the immunogenicity of biologicals. However, co-treatment with the anti-interleukin-6 receptor-alpha antibody tocilizumab (TCZ) and MTX does not demonstrate the same level of incremental benefit over TCZ monotherapy. Using the human primary cell based BioMAP phenotypic profiling platform, we investigated the impact of TCZ, adalimumab (ADA), and the small molecule drug tofacitinib (TOF), alone and in combination with MTX, on translational biomarkers that could indicate unique pharmacodynamic interactions outside those of reduced immunogenicity.

METHODS

TCZ, ADA, and TOF, alone and in combination with MTX, were profiled in BioMAP systems at concentrations close to clinical exposure levels: TCZ, 200 μg/ml; TOF1, 1.1 μM; TOF2, 0.12 µM; MTX, 10 μM. Changes in biomarkers were evaluated by statistical methods to determine whether combinations differed from the individual agents.

RESULTS

Although the BioMAP activity profile for TCZ + MTX was not significantly different from that for TCZ alone, profiles for ADA + MTX and TOF1 + MTX or TOF2 + MTX had a greater number of statistically significant different activities (P < 0.01) than did agents profiled individually.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the comparable efficacy of TCZ as monotherapy and as combination therapy and suggest that TOF, like ADA, may be more beneficial in combination with MTX. Taking an orthogonal approach to directly compare monotherapy and combination therapies indicates that MTX contributes to the efficacy of some, but not all, RA therapies and can be affected by factors additional to reduced immunogenicity.

摘要

背景

临床试验表明,肿瘤坏死因子拮抗剂生物制剂联合甲氨蝶呤(MTX)治疗类风湿关节炎的疗效优于生物单药治疗,部分原因是假设 MTX 降低了生物制剂的免疫原性。然而,与 MTX 联合治疗白细胞介素-6 受体-α抗体托珠单抗(TCZ)并没有显示出与 TCZ 单药治疗相同水平的增量获益。本研究使用基于人原代细胞的 BioMAP 表型分析平台,研究 TCZ、阿达木单抗(ADA)和小分子药物托法替尼(TOF)单独和联合 MTX 对转化生物标志物的影响,这些标志物可能表明除免疫原性降低之外的独特药效学相互作用。

方法

TCZ、ADA 和 TOF 单独和联合 MTX 以接近临床暴露水平在 BioMAP 系统中进行分析:TCZ,200μg/ml;TOF1,1.1μM;TOF2,0.12μM;MTX,10μM。通过统计方法评估生物标志物的变化,以确定组合是否与单个药物不同。

结果

尽管 TCZ+MTX 的 BioMAP 活性谱与 TCZ 单独治疗无显著差异,但 ADA+MTX 和 TOF1+MTX 或 TOF2+MTX 的活性谱具有更多具有统计学意义的不同活性(P<0.01),比单独分析的药物更多。

结论

这些数据支持 TCZ 作为单药和联合治疗的等效疗效,并表明 TOF 与 ADA 一样,与 MTX 联合使用可能更有益。采用正交方法直接比较单药和联合治疗表明,MTX 对某些(但不是所有)RA 治疗的疗效有贡献,并且可能受到除免疫原性降低以外的因素的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a66/5992722/a8471151e38f/12967_2018_1532_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验