Suppr超能文献

ASTER 中根据入院血栓负荷评分,接触抽吸和支架取栓的结果相似。

Similar Outcomes for Contact Aspiration and Stent Retriever Use According to the Admission Clot Burden Score in ASTER.

机构信息

From the Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology (F.Z., S.B., B.G.).

Stroke Unit, University Hospital of Nancy, University of Lorraine, INSERM U1254, IADI, Nancy, France; Department of Stroke Center (B.L.).

出版信息

Stroke. 2018 Jul;49(7):1669-1677. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021120. Epub 2018 Jun 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The clot burden score (CBS) at admission reliably evaluates the thrombus burden in acute ischemic stroke patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion. Mechanical thrombectomy has been diversified, especially with contact aspiration technique, and its efficiency with respect to the thrombus burden is not known. We compared reperfusion, adverse events, neurological recovery, and 90-day functional outcome of stent retriever use versus contact aspiration according to the admission CBS.

METHODS

This is a post hoc analysis of the ASTER (Contact Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever for Successful Revascularization) randomized trial. The primary outcome was successful reperfusion after all procedures, defined as modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scores 2b/3. Secondary outcomes were 90-day functional outcome, assessed with the modified Rankin Scale. Safety outcomes included 90-day mortality and any intracerebral hemorrhage.

RESULTS

A total of 231 randomized patients were included in this study: 114 patients had a CBS of 0 to 6 and 117 a CBS ≥7 at admission. Successful reperfusion at procedure end was achieved more frequently in patients with CBS ≥7 (88.9%) than patients with a CBS 0 to 6 (81.6%; fully adjusted risk ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.28). Favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-2) at 90 days was achieved in significantly more patients with CBS ≥7 (61.9%) than in patients with CBS 0 to 6 (41.8%; fully adjusted risk ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.40). No outcome differences of first-line mechanical thrombectomy strategy (aspiration versus stent) on any angiographic or clinical outcomes were observed between the 2 groups. We also found no evidence of interaction between first-line mechanical thrombectomy strategy and CBS groups regarding safety.

CONCLUSIONS

First-line mechanical thrombectomy with contact aspiration compared with stent retriever did not result in an increased successful reperfusion rate in acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion of the anterior circulation according to the admission CBS. The latter, however, seems to be a reliable prognostic indicator of angiographic and clinical outcome.

摘要

背景与目的

入院时的血栓负荷评分(CBS)可可靠地评估前循环大血管闭塞的急性缺血性脑卒中患者的血栓负荷。机械血栓切除术已经多样化,特别是采用接触抽吸技术,但其对血栓负荷的效率尚不清楚。我们根据入院时的 CBS 比较了支架取栓与接触抽吸在再灌注、不良事件、神经功能恢复和 90 天功能结局方面的差异。

方法

这是 ASTER(接触抽吸与支架取栓治疗成功再通)随机试验的事后分析。主要结局是所有操作后成功再灌注,定义为改良脑梗死溶栓评分 2b/3。次要结局是 90 天功能结局,采用改良 Rankin 量表评估。安全性结局包括 90 天死亡率和任何颅内出血。

结果

共有 231 例随机患者纳入本研究:114 例患者入院时 CBS 为 0-6,117 例患者 CBS≥7。CBS≥7 的患者(88.9%)在操作结束时达到再灌注的比例显著高于 CBS 为 0-6 的患者(81.6%;完全调整风险比,1.09;95%置信区间,1.01-1.28)。CBS≥7 的患者 90 天达到良好结局(改良 Rankin 量表评分 0-2)的比例显著高于 CBS 为 0-6 的患者(41.8%;完全调整风险比,1.19;95%置信区间,1.02-1.40)。在两组患者中,基于入院 CBS 的第一选择机械血栓切除术策略(抽吸与支架)对任何血管造影或临床结局均未观察到差异。我们还没有发现一线机械血栓切除术策略和 CBS 组之间在安全性方面存在交互作用的证据。

结论

根据入院 CBS,与支架取栓相比,接触抽吸的一线机械血栓切除术并未在前循环大血管闭塞的急性缺血性脑卒中患者中提高再灌注成功率。然而,CBS 似乎是一个可靠的血管造影和临床结局的预后指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验