Smits Niels, Finkelman Matthew D, Kelderman Henk
VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Appl Psychol Meas. 2016 Jan;40(1):22-36. doi: 10.1177/0146621615592294. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
In clinical assessment, efficient screeners are needed to ensure low respondent burden. In this article, Stochastic Curtailment (SC), a method for efficient computerized testing for classification into two classes for observable outcomes, was extended to three classes. In a post hoc simulation study using the item scores on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) of a large sample, three versions of SC, SC via Empirical Proportions (SC-EP), SC via Simple Ordinal Regression (SC-SOR), and SC via Multiple Ordinal Regression (SC-MOR) were compared at both respondent burden and classification accuracy. All methods were applied under the regular item order of the CES-D and under an ordering that was optimal in terms of the predictive power of the items. Under the regular item ordering, the three methods were equally accurate, but SC-SOR and SC-MOR needed less items. Under the optimal ordering, additional gains in efficiency were found, but SC-MOR suffered from capitalization on chance substantially. It was concluded that SC-SOR is an efficient and accurate method for clinical screening. Strengths and weaknesses of the methods are discussed.
在临床评估中,需要高效的筛查工具以确保受试者负担较低。本文将随机截尾法(SC)——一种用于将可观察结果分类为两类的高效计算机化测试方法——扩展到了三类。在一项事后模拟研究中,使用一个大样本的流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)的项目得分,在受试者负担和分类准确性方面对三种版本的SC进行了比较,即经验比例法随机截尾法(SC-EP)、简单有序回归法随机截尾法(SC-SOR)和多重有序回归法随机截尾法(SC-MOR)。所有方法均在CES-D的常规项目顺序下以及在根据项目预测能力而言最优的排序下应用。在常规项目排序下,这三种方法的准确性相同,但SC-SOR和SC-MOR所需的项目较少。在最优排序下,发现效率有进一步提高,但SC-MOR在很大程度上存在过度拟合的问题。得出的结论是,SC-SOR是一种用于临床筛查的高效且准确的方法。文中还讨论了这些方法的优缺点。