Suppr超能文献

考察对伴侣进行健康行为调节的动机的感知的准确性和偏差。

An examination of accuracy and bias in perceptions of a partner's motives for health behaviour regulation.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Br J Health Psychol. 2018 Nov;23(4):872-887. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12321. Epub 2018 Jun 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed accuracy and bias in people's perceptions of their romantic partner's adoption of short-term (avoid conflict) and long-term (later health) motives for interpersonally regulating their health behaviours.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional Web-based survey of 114 cohabiting romantic couples (N = 228 individuals) living in the United States.

METHODS

Romantic partners separately completed measures of their short-term and long-term motives for self-regulation and partner regulation of health behaviours, as well as their perceptions of partner regulation of their own health behaviours. Dyadic path analyses were conducted using the truth and bias model of judgement.

RESULTS

Targets of interpersonal regulation perceived their romantic partner's short-term and long-term motives for influencing their (the target's) health behaviour with significant accuracy. However, targets' perceptions of their partner's motives simultaneously contained about the same amount of projection of the target's own short- and long-term motives for self-regulation. There was no similarity between the target's motives for self-regulation and their partner's motives for interpersonal regulation. Targets also tended to underestimate their partner's long-term motives for interpersonal regulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Although people are somewhat accurate in their perceptions of their romantic partner's motives for attempting to influence their health behaviours, their perceptions are also contaminated by biases. This suggests that people's judgements about their partner's motives could be substantially improved. Statement of contribution What is known about this subject? Romantic partners use social influence tactics to improve each other's health behaviours. People who perceive their partner's influence attempts positively often make healthy changes. Misperceptions of a partner's motives for influence attempts may have health and relationship implications. What does this study add? People are aware of whether partner influence attempts are motivated by convenience or concern. People also project their own motives for self-regulating health behaviours onto their partner.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了人们对其伴侣采用短期(避免冲突)和长期(日后健康)动机来调节人际间健康行为的看法的准确性和偏差。

设计

一项基于网络的横断面研究,在美国对 114 对同居的浪漫伴侣(N=228 人)进行调查。

方法

浪漫伴侣分别完成了关于他们自我调节和伴侣调节健康行为的短期和长期动机的测量,以及他们对伴侣调节自己健康行为的看法。使用判断的真实性和偏差模型进行了对偶路径分析。

结果

人际调节的目标对影响他们(目标)健康行为的短期和长期伴侣动机的感知具有显著的准确性。然而,目标对伴侣动机的看法同时包含了目标自身短期和长期自我调节动机的相同程度的投射。目标的自我调节动机与他们伴侣的人际调节动机之间没有相似性。目标也倾向于低估伴侣对人际调节的长期动机。

结论

尽管人们对伴侣试图影响其健康行为的动机的看法有些准确,但这些看法也受到偏见的影响。这表明人们对伴侣动机的判断可以得到实质性的改善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验