• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

推断伴侣的理想差异:准确性、投射和人际行为的交际作用。

Inferring a partner's ideal discrepancies: accuracy, projection, and the communicative role of interpersonal behavior.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Aug;105(2):217-33. doi: 10.1037/a0033009. Epub 2013 May 27.

DOI:10.1037/a0033009
PMID:23713702
Abstract

Guided by the ideal standards model (Simpson, Fletcher, & Campbell, 2001), we tested in 2 studies whether (a) individuals were accurate when inferring how closely they matched their romantic partner's ideal standards, (b) such accurate inferences explained why people are more satisfied when they more closely match their partner's ideals, and (c) accurate inferences are generated via the partner's behavior during conflict interactions. Both members of dating and/or married couples were recruited for each study. In both studies, people's inferences into how closely they matched their partner's ideals were based on a blend of accuracy and projection processes. Individuals were also less satisfied when they failed to match their partner's ideal standards (as rated by their partner), and, as predicted, this effect was mediated by people's accurate inferences regarding how closely they matched their partner's ideals. In Study 2, spouses were also video-recorded while they attempted to resolve an important marital conflict. As predicted, Partner A's prediscussion ideal discrepancies predicted pre- to postdiscussion changes in Partner B's inferences, and this effect was partly mediated by the observed interpersonal behaviors of Partner A. Results from these dyadic data analyses suggest that people do have accurate insight into the extent to which they match their partner's ideal standards, and these inferences are generated, in part, by the way the partner behaves toward the self during diagnostic conflict interactions.

摘要

在理想标准模型(Simpson、Fletcher 和 Campbell,2001)的指导下,我们在两项研究中检验了以下内容:(a)个体在推断自己与浪漫伴侣的理想标准有多匹配时是否准确;(b)如此准确的推断是否可以解释为什么当人们更符合伴侣的理想时,他们会更满意;(c)准确的推断是否是通过伴侣在冲突互动期间的行为产生的。每一项研究都招募了约会和/或已婚夫妇的双方成员。在这两项研究中,人们对自己与伴侣理想的契合程度的推断基于准确性和投射过程的混合。当人们未能符合伴侣的理想标准(由伴侣评定)时,他们也会感到不满,而且正如预期的那样,这种效果是由人们对自己与伴侣理想的契合程度的准确推断介导的。在研究 2 中,当配偶试图解决一个重要的婚姻冲突时,他们也被录像记录。正如预期的那样,在讨论之前,伴侣 A 的理想差异预测了在讨论前后伴侣 B 的推断变化,而这种影响部分是由伴侣 A 在观察到的人际行为介导的。这些对偶数据分析的结果表明,人们确实对自己与伴侣的理想标准的匹配程度有准确的洞察力,这些推断部分是通过伴侣在诊断冲突互动中对自己的行为方式产生的。

相似文献

1
Inferring a partner's ideal discrepancies: accuracy, projection, and the communicative role of interpersonal behavior.推断伴侣的理想差异:准确性、投射和人际行为的交际作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Aug;105(2):217-33. doi: 10.1037/a0033009. Epub 2013 May 27.
2
An examination of accuracy and bias in perceptions of a partner's motives for health behaviour regulation.考察对伴侣进行健康行为调节的动机的感知的准确性和偏差。
Br J Health Psychol. 2018 Nov;23(4):872-887. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12321. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
3
When and why do ideal partner preferences affect the process of initiating and maintaining romantic relationships?何时以及为何理想伴侣偏好会影响开始和维持浪漫关系的过程?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Nov;101(5):1012-32. doi: 10.1037/a0024062.
4
Biased and accurate: depressive symptoms and daily perceptions within intimate relationships.有偏差也有准确:亲密关系中的抑郁症状和日常感知。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 May;39(5):636-50. doi: 10.1177/0146167213480188. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
5
Attachment anxiety and reactions to relationship threat: the benefits and costs of inducing guilt in romantic partners.依恋焦虑与关系威胁反应:在浪漫伴侣身上诱发内疚感的利弊。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Feb;106(2):235-56. doi: 10.1037/a0034371. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
6
Measuring up: the unique emotional and regulatory outcomes of different perceived partner-ideal discrepancies in romantic relationships.衡量标准:不同浪漫关系中感知到的伴侣-理想差异所带来的独特情感和调节结果。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Sep;103(3):472-88. doi: 10.1037/a0029054. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
7
Why do(n't) your partner's efforts at self-improvement make you happy? An implicit theories perspective.伴侣的自我提升努力为何会让你感到幸福?内隐理论视角。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Jan;38(1):101-13. doi: 10.1177/0146167211420734. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
8
Companionship goals and marital goal concordance contribute to relationship satisfaction partly through dyadic coping in dating couples.陪伴目标和婚姻目标的一致性部分通过情侣间的二元应对方式,对关系满意度产生影响。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2024 Nov;37(6):685-698. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2024.2338107. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
9
The association between self-concealment from one's partner and relationship well-being.与伴侣隐瞒自我和关系幸福感之间的关系。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Jan;38(1):39-51. doi: 10.1177/0146167211429331. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
10
When bias and insecurity promote accuracy: mean-level bias and tracking accuracy in couples' conflict discussions.当偏见和不安全感促进准确性时:夫妻冲突讨论中的平均水平偏差和跟踪准确性。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 May;38(5):642-55. doi: 10.1177/0146167211432764. Epub 2012 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Are you tired of "us?" Accuracy and bias in couples' perceptions of relational boredom.你厌倦了“我们”吗?夫妻对关系倦怠认知中的准确性与偏差。
J Soc Pers Relat. 2023 Oct;40(10):3091-3120. doi: 10.1177/02654075231168141. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
2
Birds of a Feather Laugh Together: An Investigation of Humour Style Similarity in Married Couples.物以类聚,笑在一起:对已婚夫妇幽默风格相似性的调查。
Eur J Psychol. 2016 Aug 19;12(3):406-19. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v12i3.1115. eCollection 2016 Aug.