Suppr超能文献

CA-125、HE4、恶性风险指数II(RMI-II)和恶性风险算法(ROMA)在盆腔肿块鉴别诊断中的判别价值:来自葡萄牙一家转诊中心的结论

Discriminative value of CA-125, HE4, Risk of Malignancy Index II (RMI-II) and Risk of Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) in the differential diagnosis of pelvic masses: conclusions from a referral Centre in Portugal.

作者信息

Melo Ângela, Veríssimo Renata, Farinha Margarida, Martins Nuno Nogueira, Martins Francisco Nogueira

机构信息

a Gynaecology and Obstetrics Department , Centro Hospitalar Tondela-Viseu, EPE , Viseu , Portugal.

b Laboratory Medicine Department , Centro Hospitalar Tondela-Viseu, EPE , Viseu , Portugal.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Nov;38(8):1140-1145. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1457632. Epub 2018 Jun 8.

Abstract

The major purpose of this article was to compare the discriminative value of different algorithms and serum biomarkers in the differential diagnosis of adnexal masses. We performed a retrospective study with 247 women with adnexal neoplasia, submitted to surgical treatment and with a histological diagnosis. The evaluation of the area under the curve (AUC) for isolated CA-125 and HE4, and for ROMA and RMI-II, showed a better specificity of HE4 and RMI-II in premenopausal women. In the postmenopausal group, ROMA and RMI-II were the algorithms with a better performance. Impact Statement What is already known on this subject? CA-125 remains the most commonly used biomarker used to predict the behaviour of an adnexal mass, but it has a low sensitivity for stage I tumours. Other isolated serum markers have emerged more recently, such as HE4, as well as more complex algorithms, such as RMI or ROMA. It remains unclear which is the best marker/algorithm to predict the behaviour of an adnexal mass. What do the results of this study add? Our findings showed that ROMA is a suitable marker for postmenopausal women, with no advantage found in the premenopausal women when compared with an isolated HE4. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The different algorithms of the preoperative discrimination of ovarian neoplasia appear to have different AUC, SN and SP in the pre- or the postmenopausal patients. For the premenopausal women, the use of ROMA does not seem to have any advantage over the isolated use of HE4, which does not lose specificity even when the borderline tumours are considered for discrimination. In the postmenopausal women, ROMA is a valid algorithm with a good sensitivity. The RMI-II showed a good performance in both groups, although it depends on the ultrasound findings and has an important interobserver variability. This information allows a more targeted selection of markers and algorithms to be requested prior to surgery of ovarian neoplasms regarding the menopausal status of each patient.

摘要

本文的主要目的是比较不同算法和血清生物标志物在附件包块鉴别诊断中的判别价值。我们对247例接受手术治疗且有组织学诊断的附件肿瘤女性患者进行了一项回顾性研究。对单独的CA - 125和HE4以及ROMA和RMI - II的曲线下面积(AUC)评估显示,HE4和RMI - II在绝经前女性中具有更好的特异性。在绝经后组中,ROMA和RMI - II是表现更好的算法。影响声明关于该主题已知的信息有哪些?CA - 125仍然是用于预测附件包块行为的最常用生物标志物,但它对I期肿瘤的敏感性较低。最近出现了其他单独的血清标志物,如HE4,以及更复杂的算法,如RMI或ROMA。目前尚不清楚哪种标志物/算法最适合预测附件包块的行为。本研究结果有何补充?我们的研究结果表明,ROMA是绝经后女性的合适标志物,与单独使用HE4相比,在绝经前女性中未发现优势。这些发现对临床实践和/或进一步研究有何意义?卵巢肿瘤术前鉴别的不同算法在绝经前或绝经后患者中似乎具有不同的AUC、敏感性(SN)和特异性(SP)。对于绝经前女性,使用ROMA似乎并不比单独使用HE4有任何优势,即使在考虑鉴别交界性肿瘤时,HE4也不会丧失特异性。在绝经后女性中,ROMA是一种有效的算法,具有良好的敏感性。RMI - II在两组中均表现良好,尽管它依赖于超声检查结果且存在重要的观察者间变异性。这些信息有助于在卵巢肿瘤手术前根据每位患者的绝经状态更有针对性地选择所需的标志物和算法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验