Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Prevention Research Center, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Oakland, California.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2018 May;79(3):417-422. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2018.79.417.
We investigated how associations between social and situational characteristics (number of people, adult supervision, group gender composition, group age composition, ease of alcohol access, and weekend) and underage drinking are moderated by the specific locations in which drinking occurs.
Using a case-crossover design and retrospective surveys, a sample of 385 adolescents (mean age = 16.5 years; 47.3% female) from 24 mid-size California cities reported the last time they drank alcohol in a specific location (restaurant, outdoors, home) and the last time they were at the same type of location without drinking, as well as characteristics of each drinking and nondrinking event (N = 1,096 events).
Results of multilevel regression models indicated that perceived ease of alcohol access was associated with drinking across all locations (adjusted odds ratios [aORs] = 2.11-2.75, all p < .01). Weekend (vs. weekday) increased the odds of drinking outdoors (aOR = 3.75, p < .001) and in the home (aOR = 4.37, p < .001), as did a lack of adult supervision (aOR = 1.70, p < .05 for outdoors; aOR = 1.64, p < .01 for home). Larger groups (aOR = 1.06, p < .001) and being with older people (aOR = 2.28, p < .001) increased the odds of drinking in the home only. Significant cross-level interaction effects between location and group size (aOR = 0.96; p < .001), group gender composition (aOR = 0.78, p < .05), group age composition (aOR = 0.70, p < .01), ease of alcohol access (aOR = 0.88, p < .05), and weekend (aOR = 0.66, p < .05) suggested that these predictors were less significant in outdoor locations compared with the home.
Locations moderate the social and situational characteristics of events and are important for underage drinking. Results can inform targeted prevention efforts.
我们研究了社会和情境特征(人数、成人监督、群体性别构成、群体年龄构成、酒精获取的难易程度以及周末)与未成年人饮酒之间的关联是如何受到饮酒发生地点的具体位置影响的。
使用病例交叉设计和回顾性调查,从 24 个加利福尼亚州中等城市中抽取了 385 名青少年(平均年龄为 16.5 岁,女性占 47.3%)作为样本,他们报告了在特定地点(餐厅、户外、家庭)最后一次饮酒的时间,以及最后一次在没有饮酒的同一类型地点的时间,以及每次饮酒和非饮酒事件的特征(N=1096 次事件)。
多水平回归模型的结果表明,酒精获取的难易程度与所有地点的饮酒行为有关(调整后的优势比[aOR]为 2.11-2.75,所有 p<0.01)。周末(与工作日相比)增加了在户外(aOR=3.75,p<0.001)和家中(aOR=4.37,p<0.001)饮酒的几率,同时缺乏成人监督(aOR=1.70,p<0.05 用于户外;aOR=1.64,p<0.01 用于家庭)。更大的群体(aOR=1.06,p<0.001)和与老年人在一起(aOR=2.28,p<0.001)仅增加了在家中饮酒的几率。地点和群体规模(aOR=0.96;p<0.001)、群体性别构成(aOR=0.78,p<0.05)、群体年龄构成(aOR=0.70,p<0.01)、酒精获取的难易程度(aOR=0.88,p<0.05)和周末(aOR=0.66,p<0.05)之间存在显著的跨水平交互作用效应,这表明这些预测因素在户外地点与家庭相比不太重要。
地点调节了事件的社会和情境特征,对未成年人饮酒很重要。研究结果可为有针对性的预防措施提供信息。