Department of Health Behavior and Health Systems, School of Public Health, University of North Texas Health Science Center.
Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Texas Health Science Center.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2023 Dec;37(8):1030-1038. doi: 10.1037/adb0000949. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
Although there is growing evidence that alcohol use at the daily level is associated with positive but not negative affect, results are mixed when examining marijuana use and simultaneous alcohol and marijuana (SAM) use (i.e., use with overlapping effects). In addition, less is known about these daily level associations among diverse samples of adolescents and young adults. The present study will address these gaps.
Participants ( = 1,006; 57.3% female, 43.1% White, Non-Hispanic, ages 15-25; = 20.0) were part of a study on substance use that consisted of a 3-week ecological momentary assessment (EMA) burst design (eight surveys per week, up to 2×/day) that was repeated quarterly over a 12-month period.
Within-person results indicated that on days with elevated positive affect, participants reported consuming more drinks, whereas positive affect was not significant for hours high from marijuana. In addition, on days with elevated negative affect, participants reported fewer hours high from marijuana. No association was found between negative affect and number of drinks. Finally, within-person results indicated that on alcohol or marijuana days with elevated positive affect, individuals were more likely to report SAM use. There was no association found between negative affect and SAM use.
Results have implications such that in-the-moment interventions for alcohol and SAM use may be more salient when individuals have higher positive affect than average, whereas such interventions may be more relevant for marijuana use when negative affect is lower compared to average levels. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
尽管越来越多的证据表明,日常饮酒与积极情绪有关,而与消极情绪无关,但在研究大麻使用以及同时使用酒精和大麻(即具有重叠作用的使用)时,结果却存在差异。此外,在不同的青少年和年轻成年人样本中,对这些日常水平关联的了解较少。本研究将解决这些差距。
参与者(n=1006;57.3%女性,43.1%为白种人,非西班牙裔,年龄在 15-25 岁之间;n=20.0)是一项关于物质使用的研究的一部分,该研究包括为期 3 周的生态瞬时评估(EMA)爆发设计(每周进行 8 次调查,每天最多 2 次),在 12 个月的时间内每季度重复一次。
个体内结果表明,在积极情绪升高的日子里,参与者报告的饮酒量更多,而积极情绪对大麻致高时间没有显著影响。此外,在消极情绪升高的日子里,参与者报告的大麻致高时间较少。消极情绪与饮酒量之间没有关联。最后,个体内结果表明,在积极情绪升高的酒精或大麻日,个体更有可能报告同时使用酒精和大麻。消极情绪与同时使用酒精和大麻之间没有关联。
研究结果表明,在当下时刻进行针对酒精和同时使用酒精和大麻的干预措施,当个体的积极情绪高于平均水平时可能更有意义,而当消极情绪低于平均水平时,这种干预措施可能对大麻使用更为相关。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。