Suppr超能文献

肌肉注射咪达唑仑、奥氮平、齐拉西酮或氟哌啶醇治疗急诊科急性激越。

Intramuscular Midazolam, Olanzapine, Ziprasidone, or Haloperidol for Treating Acute Agitation in the Emergency Department.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;72(4):374-385. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.04.027. Epub 2018 Jun 7.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Agitation in the emergency department (ED) can pose a threat to patient and provider safety; therefore, treatment is indicated. The purpose of this study is to compare haloperidol, olanzapine, midazolam, and ziprasidone to treat agitation.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study of consecutive patients receiving intramuscular medication to treat agitation in the ED. Medications were administered according to an a priori protocol in which the initial medication given was predetermined in the following 3-week blocks: haloperidol 5 mg, ziprasidone 20 mg, olanzapine 10 mg, midazolam 5 mg, and haloperidol 10 mg. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients adequately sedated at 15 minutes, assessed with the Altered Mental Status Scale.

RESULTS

Seven hundred thirty-seven patients were enrolled (median age 40 years; 72% men). At 15 minutes, midazolam resulted in a greater proportion of patients adequately sedated (Altered Mental Status Scale <1) compared with ziprasidone (difference 18%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 6% to 29%), haloperidol 5 mg (difference 30%; 95% CI 19% to 41%), haloperidol 10 mg (difference 28%; 95% CI 17% to 39%), and olanzapine (difference 9%; 95% CI -1% to 20%). Olanzapine resulted in a greater proportion of patients adequately sedated at 15 minutes compared with haloperidol 5 mg (difference 20%; 95% CI 10% to 31%), haloperidol 10 mg (difference 18%; 95% CI 7% to 29%), and ziprasidone (difference 8%; 95% CI -3% to 19%). Adverse events were uncommon: cardiac arrest (0), extrapyramidal adverse effects (2; 0.3%), hypotension (5; 0.5%), hypoxemia (10; 1%), and intubation (4; 0.5%), and occurred at similar rates in each group.

CONCLUSION

Intramuscular midazolam achieved more effective sedation in agitated ED patients at 15 minutes than haloperidol, ziprasidone, and perhaps olanzapine. Olanzapine provided more effective sedation than haloperidol. No differences in adverse events were identified.

摘要

研究目的

急诊科(ED)的激越可能对患者和医护人员的安全构成威胁;因此,需要进行治疗。本研究的目的是比较氟哌啶醇、奥氮平、咪达唑仑和齐拉西酮治疗激越。

方法

这是一项连续入组接受肌内注射药物治疗 ED 激越患者的前瞻性观察性研究。根据事先制定的方案给予药物,在前 3 周的每个时间段内,最初给予的药物是预先确定的:氟哌啶醇 5mg、齐拉西酮 20mg、奥氮平 10mg、咪达唑仑 5mg 和氟哌啶醇 10mg。主要结局是在 15 分钟时,使用改变的精神状态量表评估患者的镇静程度。

结果

共纳入 737 例患者(中位年龄 40 岁;72%为男性)。在 15 分钟时,咪达唑仑使更多的患者达到足够的镇静(改变的精神状态量表<1),与齐拉西酮(差异 18%;95%置信区间 [CI] 6%至 29%)、氟哌啶醇 5mg(差异 30%;95%CI 19%至 41%)、氟哌啶醇 10mg(差异 28%;95%CI 17%至 39%)和奥氮平(差异 9%;95%CI -1%至 20%)相比。奥氮平使更多的患者在 15 分钟时达到足够的镇静,与氟哌啶醇 5mg(差异 20%;95%CI 10%至 31%)、氟哌啶醇 10mg(差异 18%;95%CI 7%至 29%)和齐拉西酮(差异 8%;95%CI -3%至 19%)相比。不良事件并不常见:心脏骤停(0)、锥体外系不良反应(2;0.3%)、低血压(5;0.5%)、低氧血症(10;1%)和插管(4;0.5%),并且在每个组中以相似的频率发生。

结论

在 15 分钟时,肌内注射咪达唑仑对 ED 激越患者的镇静效果优于氟哌啶醇、齐拉西酮,也许还优于奥氮平。奥氮平比氟哌啶醇更能有效镇静。未发现不良事件的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验