Mashaw Sydney A, Anwar Ahmed I, Vu Judy N, Thomassen Austin S, Beesley Maya L, Shekoohi Sahar, Kaye Alan D
School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport, Shreveport, LA 71103, USA.
Department of Psychology, Quinnipiac University, Hamden, CT 06518, USA.
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 18;13(8):932. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13080932.
Agitation is a frequent and challenging symptom in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, characterized by heightened motor activity, emotional distress, and potential aggression. This symptom is most observed during acute episodes, representing a significant burden on patients, caregivers, and healthcare systems. Agitation is a leading cause of emergency department visits and psychiatric hospitalizations, necessitating prompt and effective interventions to ensure safety and mitigate its far-reaching impact. Traditional treatments, including high-potency antipsychotics and benzodiazepines, remain first-line options but are associated with significant drawbacks such as sedation, extrapyramidal symptoms, tolerance, and limited applicability in certain patient populations, especially those with respiratory or cardiac depression and the elderly. Non-pharmacologic strategies like de-escalation techniques and environmental modifications are invaluable but may be impractical in acute care settings, as speed and efficiency are critical in emergent settings. These limitations, including the onset of extrapyramidal symptoms with high-dose antipsychotics and the development of tolerance with benzodiazepines, highlight gaps in care, including the need for faster-acting, safer, and more patient-friendly alternatives that reduce reliance on physical restraints and invasive interventions. This review explores the evolution of treatments for agitation, focusing on alternative and innovative approaches. To highlight these treatments, an extensive review of the literature was conducted utilizing PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase.com, and other search engines. Key developments include sublingual dexmedetomidine, recently FDA-approved, which offers sedation without respiratory depression and a non-invasive administration route. Similarly, subcutaneous olanzapine provides a more convenient alternative to intramuscular injections, reducing injection-related complications. Other emerging treatments such as gabapentin, pregabalin, and ketamine show promise in addressing agitation in specific contexts, including comorbid conditions and treatment-resistant cases. A comparative analysis of these therapies highlights their mechanisms of action, clinical evidence, and practical challenges. Future directions emphasize intranasal delivery systems, novel pharmacologic agents, and potential roles for cannabinoids in managing agitation. These innovations aim to balance rapid symptom control with improved patient safety and experience. The set back with these emerging techniques is a lack of standardized dosing and protocols. They also face ethical concerns, including the chance of misuse or abuse, as well as regulatory barriers, as they lack FDA approval and their legality changes between states. This review underscores the clinical, practical, and ethical considerations in advancing care for agitated patients, paving the way for more effective and compassionate management strategies in psychiatric settings.
激越在精神分裂症和双相情感障碍中是一种常见且具有挑战性的症状,其特征为运动活动增加、情绪困扰以及潜在的攻击性。这种症状在急性发作期最为常见,给患者、照料者和医疗系统带来了巨大负担。激越是急诊科就诊和精神科住院治疗的主要原因,因此需要迅速有效的干预措施以确保安全并减轻其深远影响。传统治疗方法,包括高效能抗精神病药物和苯二氮䓬类药物,仍然是一线选择,但存在显著缺点,如镇静作用、锥体外系症状、耐受性,并且在某些患者群体中适用性有限,尤其是那些有呼吸或心脏抑制的患者以及老年人。非药物策略,如降级技术和环境改造,非常重要,但在急性护理环境中可能不实用,因为在紧急情况下速度和效率至关重要。这些局限性,包括高剂量抗精神病药物引发的锥体外系症状以及苯二氮䓬类药物耐受性的产生,凸显了护理方面的差距,包括需要更快起效、更安全且对患者更友好的替代方法,以减少对身体约束和侵入性干预的依赖。 本综述探讨了激越治疗方法的演变,重点关注替代和创新方法。为了突出这些治疗方法,利用PubMed、谷歌学术、Embase.com和其他搜索引擎对文献进行了广泛综述。关键进展包括最近获得美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的舌下含服右美托咪定,它能提供镇静作用且无呼吸抑制,给药途径为非侵入性。同样,皮下注射奥氮平为肌肉注射提供了更方便的替代方法,减少了与注射相关的并发症。其他新兴治疗方法,如加巴喷丁、普瑞巴林和氯胺酮,在特定情况下,包括合并症和难治性病例中,在解决激越方面显示出前景。对这些疗法的比较分析突出了它们的作用机制、临床证据和实际挑战。未来的方向强调鼻内给药系统、新型药物以及大麻素在管理激越方面的潜在作用。这些创新旨在在快速控制症状与提高患者安全性和体验之间取得平衡。这些新兴技术的不足之处在于缺乏标准化的给药剂量和方案。它们还面临伦理问题,包括误用或滥用的可能性,以及监管障碍,因为它们缺乏FDA批准且各州的合法性有所不同。本综述强调了在推进对激越患者的护理时的临床、实际和伦理考量,为精神科环境中更有效且富有同情心的管理策略铺平了道路。